My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-21-2007 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2007
>
05-21-2007 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/5/2012 3:26:55 PM
Creation date
7/5/2012 3:26:40 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
233
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
� MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMIVIISSION MEETING �. <br /> Monday,Apri116,2007 <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> (#07-3280 Vogue ICF Homes on behalf of Tom Parker, Continued) <br /> Vogstrom stated they could probably drop the garage slightly to be located two feet below the road and <br /> still do the drainage. Vogstrom stated there is a very steep hill and bluff on the lots and with the house <br /> being located 30 to 40 feet back further,it would be harder to see the lower part of the house. <br /> � Zullo moved,Kempf seconded,to table Application#07-3280,Vogue ICF Homes,Inc.,on behalf <br /> of Tom Parker,Inc., 1348 Rest Point Circle, and#07-3281 Vogue ICF Homes,Inc.,on behalf of <br /> Tom Parker,Inc., 1350 Rest Point Circle. <br /> Parker inquired whether the issues are the height and the drainage. <br /> Walsh stated the massing is also an issue. <br /> Berg recommended the applicant speak with Staf£ <br /> VOTE: Ayes 6,Nays 0. � <br /> 11. #07-3283 STEVEN AND SHEILA SIGEL, 1399 PARK DRIVE,VARIANCE, 10:37— <br /> 10:48 P.M. <br /> -Steven Sigel,Applicant,was present. <br /> Curtis stated the applicant is requesting approval for an average lakeshore setback variance,hardcover <br /> � variances.within the 75-250 foot zone and 250-500 foot setback zone as well as a conditional use permit <br /> for retaining walls and grading in order to construct an addition to the existing home and rebuild an <br /> extensive retaining wall system. The deck system°currently serves as a sidewalk from the driveway to � <br /> � the home. The applicant would also like to remove a wooden deck and replace it with a paver path. <br /> The existing retaining wall is proposed to�be reconstructed and reconfigured due to deterioration. <br /> The applicant is proposing to construct a 21' x 10' addition to the existing home. A hardcover variance <br /> is required as the property exceeds 25 percent <br /> Planning Staff recommends approval of the hardcover variances as proposed as well as approval of the <br /> conditional use permit for the wall construction in accordance with the City Engineer's <br /> recommendations. <br /> Sigel stated they are looking to construct a small addition to the right side of the house and replace a <br /> � retaining wall. Sigel demonstrated on the overhead where the retaining wall and stairway is located. <br /> Sigel stated the wood walkway is extremely slippery in the wintertime and they would like to replace it <br /> � with a paver walkway. The retaining walls are also bowing out. If the retaining walls fail,they would <br /> not have any access to the front of the house. Sigel stated the engineering firm they hired to design the , <br /> project is proposing to utilize diamond blocks for the retaining wall and replace the deck with pavers. <br /> PAGE 32 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.