Laserfiche WebLink
. . i <br /> MINUTES OF THE � ; . <br /> ORONO PLANNiNG COMNIISSION MEETING �:� • � <br /> � Monday,Apri116,2007 <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> (#07-3278 John Terrance Homes, Continued) � <br /> Gaffron inquired whether the motion approves reinstating the language but not to make the specific � <br /> changes that the applicant is requesting � <br /> Kroeger stated it would approve the requested changes but without the limit on the square footage. <br /> Kempf stated he was very concerned when this proposal initially came before the Planning Commission <br /> because of the lack of information that was provided,but that a large number of his concerns have been <br /> answered tonight and that he is fairly confident at this point that this project will succeed. . <br /> Berg seconded the above motion. VOTE: Ayes 6,Nays 0. . <br /> (Recess taken at 9:16—9:23 p.m.) , <br /> 9. #07-3279 ARTHUR ERICKSON,720 BIG ISLAND,CONDITIONAI.USE PERMIT, ' <br /> 9:23—9:36 P.M. ' <br /> Arthur Erickson,Applicant,was present. ' <br /> Curtis stated the applicant is requesting a conditional use permit in order to construct an accessory i <br /> `building larger than 500 square feet as permitted by code. The applicant originally met with Staff and , <br /> � � discussed a proposal to construct a 2,000 square foot accessory building on the property to house their <br /> large watercraft and lawn maintenance equipment. Following discussions with Staff,the applicant <br /> � decided not to apply for a variance to construct the 2,000 square foot building and instead request the � <br /> conditional approvalrinstead for two 1,000 square foot buildings. <br /> However, after reviewing the site plan, Staff has concluded that two 1,000 square feet buildings placed <br /> � ten feet apart will appear very�much as one building. In referring to the mainland regulations regarding . <br /> accessory building sizes and the applicant's property area, Staff finds that it may be reasonable to allow <br /> construction of a 2,000 square foot building. ' <br /> Having said this,the location of the closest adjacent property owner is 100 feet from the proposed ' , <br /> . buildings. The Planning Commission may want to consider requiring an additional setback from the <br /> western property line. Similarly,the applicant has a considerable amount of acreage and perhaps an <br /> additional setback froin the rea�lot line is appropriate as well. � <br /> Staff recommends approval of the variance to allow a single 2,000 square foot building to be <br /> � constructed on the property with any additional conditions the Planning Commission deems appropriate. � <br /> Kempf inquired what the other accessory buildings consist of. � <br /> � PAGE 24 ` <br />