My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-21-2007 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2007
>
05-21-2007 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/5/2012 3:26:55 PM
Creation date
7/5/2012 3:26:40 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
233
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
. 1VIINUTES OF THE <br /> - ORONO PLANI�IING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday,April 16,2007 <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> (#07-3277 Albin and Susan Nelson, Continued) <br /> Nelson stated they would need to remove one tree for sure and possibly one other tree,but that the lot <br /> � has a number of trees. <br /> . Kroeger inquired whether there is still an issue with the accessory structure. � <br /> Nelson stated they are willing to relocate the accessory structure. <br /> Turner asked what the dimension of the eating area addition would be. <br /> Nelson stated the width is 15' and the entire addition is 15' x 36'. Nelson indicated the deck is 15' 6". <br /> Chair Kempf opened the public hearing at 8:13 p.m. <br /> There were no public comments regarding this application. <br /> Chair Kempf closed tHe public hearing at 8:13 p.m. <br /> Rice inquired whether Staff's recommendations have changed given the revisions to the plan. <br /> Turner stated she would leave it up to the Planning Commission. <br /> Kroeger noted there has been a significant chai�ge in the encroachment. _ <br /> " Zullo stated in her view the applicant has made some positive changes to the encroachment and that she <br /> would not have a problem approving the application as presently proposed. <br /> Kempf commented in his view there is a fair amount of space available on this lot that could be utilized <br /> to avoid the need for a variance and that it comes down to the design. <br /> � Zullo pointed out that the main reason for the design probably relates to the interior layout of the house. <br /> Kroeger inquired whether there would be a four-car garage. <br /> . Nelson stated that area is for storage and is not for a fourth car. <br /> Zullo stated she is fine with the application given the practicality of where the addition is located. <br /> Zullo inquired whether the neighbor to the rear is present tonight to comment on this project. <br /> . Kempf noted there were no comments during the public comment period. <br /> Nelson indicated she did send a letter to that neighbor but has not heard from them. � <br /> PAGE 17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.