My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-19-2007 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2007
>
03-19-2007 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/19/2012 4:41:09 PM
Creation date
6/19/2012 4:40:41 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
529
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
. N�NUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMNIISSION � � � <br /> , Tuesday,February 20,2007 � � � <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> 4. #07-3250 PHII.,IP CARLSON,2060 WAYZATA BOULEVARD WEST,PUD, <br /> COMIV�RCIAL�ITE PLAN, SUBDIVISION,6:06—6:31 P.M. � <br /> • Gina Carlson,Applicant,and Jeff Shopek,Loucks&Associates,were present. <br /> Gaffron stated the applicant is requesting the following in order to construct ten units of office condos <br /> on five lots arid one common lot,to be imown as Amber Woods Office Centre: <br /> 1. B-6 PUD Gerieral Concept Plan approval; ' <br /> 2. Preliminary Plat approval in order to create five unit lots and one common lot; <br /> 3. Commercial site plan approval in order to obtain building permits; . <br /> 4. Easement vacations in conjunction with dedication of new easements. <br /> This application was reviewed at the January Planning Commission meeting,with the applicants being <br /> � directed to do the following: � . <br /> 1. Redesign the access layout to enable it to be functional for all potential turning movements. <br /> 2. Dumpster locations should be reconsidered to be more funciional for all users. <br /> 3. Plantings.are needed above the retaining walls abutting adjacent�commercial site. <br /> 4. �Retaining wall design submitted is only sufficient for the site rear walls,and for those walls it <br /> indioates excavation will be needed onto the adjacent property,which is unaccepta,ble. <br /> Additional wall details are also needed for the other�wall systems on the site. <br /> . The new site plans and grading plans show the entrance driveway has been revised to incorporate <br /> standard turning movements while providing direct straight-through access to both of the adjacent <br /> properties. This is being accomplished by lowering the rear of the site by about one foot and the front <br /> of the site by about two feet and relocating lost parking stalls to the south end of the lot facing ��- <br /> - Highway 12. The parking remains at 102 stalls,meeting the 100-stall requirement. <br /> As a result of the access changes,the rear three buildings will be slightly lower at one-half foot and the <br /> most southerly building will be as much as two�feet lower than the prior plan. The building designs <br /> have not changed; the buildings are merely dropped along with the finished grade. In addition, <br /> • retaining walls along the southwest boundary of the site will be reduced in height or eliminated. <br /> Retaining walls along the north and east boundaries will be 1-2 feet higher than previously indicated. <br /> . An additional wall east of the most southerly building will be added,and the open faced facing the <br /> � senior housing building to the east will be more obscured. Building locations have shifted slightly in a <br /> . • few instances,but not more than a few feet and all meet required setbacks. . <br /> PAGE 2 � <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.