My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-19-2007 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2007
>
03-19-2007 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/19/2012 4:41:09 PM
Creation date
6/19/2012 4:40:41 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
529
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
_ , , . �• FILE 07-3266 <br /> • . � ' . February 20,2006 . <br /> . Page 5 of 6 : <br /> �� ' ' If the proposal were altered so the garage only had a double overhead door, the garage apron <br /> , were narrowed, and the front door were moved to�the wall facing the street, there would be <br /> about 2;650 square feet of hardcover. This would be about 33 percent of the 75 to 250 foot <br /> � � �zone and street side 0 to 75 foot zone. If the house were reduced to 1,500 square feet there <br /> • ' ' would be about 2,347 square feet of hardcover. This would be about 283�percent of these . � , , <br /> two zones. ` . . . , . <br /> . , Another way of considering hardcover would be to review each type of haxdcover _and � <br /> . � determine if the amount proposed is reasonable. . . <br /> ' Is the proposed height variance reasonable? . <br /> The Planning Commission recommended approval of a code change that increase the �side <br /> . � - setbacks for zvider lots, regulated peak height based on the width of the lot and disregarti <br /> , � windows in gable ends when determuung building height. It was tabled by the City Council <br /> ' � for further study of the setback and peak height portions ofthe code change. The basis for <br /> ' - disregarding windows in gable ends was that they did not add to the mass of the roof. What <br /> is interesting is that the proposed dormers, which do add mass,would be disregarded because <br /> they do not have windows and the peak of the roof over the dormers is lower than the peak of <br /> " the main roof. The proposed code change would limit this property to a peak height of 37.5 . <br /> feet. As proposed peak height would be about 38 feet. The code change would not increase <br /> the minimum setbacks forthis lot. � � � <br /> , Is the proposed house compatible with the surrounding area? . . <br /> The Baldur Park area is in transition. Older hornes are being replaced. Of the 521ots in the <br /> � area between Tonkawa Road and the channel beiween Crystal Bay and North Arm, 39 lots <br /> - � appear to be substandard in area and width. � . : <br /> This is the third house to be re laced on Baldur Park Road in recent years. The others were: - <br /> s Address Lot 75- Fdn. Total Hardcover Hardcover Stories Peak <br /> ' : Area 250 Size Hardcover 0-75 75-250 ' Height . <br /> . ac. Area . • . <br /> 1392 .729 15,190 3,611 5,606 8.7%* 30% Two plus 37'(est.) . : <br /> . . basement <br /> 1436 .19 4,132 -1,500 2,418 24.�9% 36.16% Two ° 28' <br /> 1444 .19 5,180 1,500 2,330 0 44.98% Two �� 34' � <br /> * Property has two 0-75' zones . . <br /> � Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? � <br /> Staff Recommendation <br /> � f Planning Staff recommends: . . • <br /> � . - _ . � <br /> � 1. Approval of the width and area variances. . <br /> 2. Approval�of the floodplain variance subject to approval of the`grading plan by the ' <br /> � City Engineer and the MCWD. . � � . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.