Laserfiche WebLink
1VIINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> Tuesday,February 20,2007 <br /> � 6:00 o'clock p.m. , <br /> (#07-3262 Alexander Design Group,Continued) <br /> Zullo sta.ted it is the bulldng above that is the issue. <br /> Rahn stated he would like to see a minimal increase in the height. � <br /> Beck stated they possibly could reduce the height of the structure. . <br /> . Alexander stated she has a concern with redesigning the plans and then having to request a variance � <br /> for the three stories under the new ordinance. , <br /> Curtis stated Staff has been looking at a few applications that were submitted prior to the adoption of _ <br /> the new ordinance and that it is not fair to require current applications to adhere to the strictest <br /> definition of the new ordinance. � � <br /> Gaffron stated the applications that are filed with the City prior to the new ordinance being published <br /> would be subject to the old ordinance. Gaffron pointed out two of the four sides of the house have at <br /> least six or seven feet exposure for the entire length and the.other two sides have less exposure. <br /> Staff's conclusion was that inore than 50 percent of the basement was exposed and would then be <br /> considered a story. � . <br /> Gaffron stated in the Baldur Park area there would be no basements and that they vc�ould be held to the <br /> definition of two and a half stories. � <br /> ' Kempf inquired whether direction could be given to lower the peak height and then have the <br />� � application go forward to the Council for their input on the variance to the three stories. <br /> ________Rahn stated it was his understanding it would be tabled to allow them to redesign their plans. <br /> • Gaffron stated it might be beneficial if the Planning Commission gives some direction to the applicant <br /> on the issues raised in the report. , � <br /> • Rahn stated he would like to see the height of the main structure reduced.closer to what currently � <br /> exists. <br /> Alexander pointed out the house currently is stacked on the lakeside. <br /> Kroeger inquired what the impacts of buffering the.wetland would be. , _ <br /> Gaffron stated a conservation easement would be required over that portion of their property that is � <br /> abutting the we�land and that the owners potentially would be required to change the vegetation in the <br /> � area of the wetland and maintain it as a riatural area. <br /> PAGE 24 <br />