Laserfiche WebLink
:�� � , <br /> � ..A�.^A . . <br /> � <br /> . A <br /> � Date Application Received: IZ-20-06 <br /> � D1te Application Considered�s Complete: 2-2-07 <br /> 60-D�y Review Period�xpires: 4-3-07 � ,. <br /> TO: Chair Ra1ui and Orono Planning Conullission <br /> � Ron Moorse, City Administrator <br /> FROM: Mike Gaffron,Plamung Director <br /> DATE: March 14,2007 <br /> SUBJECT: #07-3259 Lake Couiit�y Builders for Kathy & Gary Gangstee, 1374 Rest Point <br /> Road. -Variances -REVISED PLANS -Public Hearing <br /> Zoning District: LR-1B, Single Fa.ulily Lakeshore Residential, 1-acre/140' minimum <br /> Lot Area/Width: 28,500 s.f. (0.65 acres)/ 131' @ shoreline, 138' @ 75' setback <br /> Application Status: The applicants have submitted a revised site plan, revised building <br /> plans and elevations, and revised hardcover calculatioils. In these new plans, the existing <br /> � house will be completely reinoved, and a new 2-story hoine of approximately the sanie 30'x42' <br /> footprint will be coilstructed approximately 12' further fioin the road to ineet the required <br /> . street setback. The 2-story coruiecting link to the garage is still proposed. As a result of these <br /> revisions, and the consideration of tlus site as a total replacement, the oi�ly variances required <br /> are: � <br /> 1) lot area(0.65 acre where 1.0 acre is required); <br /> 2)hardcover: 75-250' zone: 27.3%proposed where 30.3% exists and 25%is allowed; <br /> 0-75' zone: 9.0%proposed to remain where 0% is allowed; ancl <br /> 3) side setback for existing garage attachment and upward expansion: 9.1' existing wllere <br /> 10' is required. • <br /> 4)variance to Section 78-1432 re: Accessory Structures (see Exh. F and page 5) <br /> One of the property owners' goals continues to be the ability to retain the nonconforining pool <br /> which is partialiy within the 0-75' zone. <br /> Staff Recon:nze�:datio�a: <br /> The applicants have responded to the Pla.iming Coinmission's direction fiom the February <br /> meeting. The primary issue for Plaruling Coizimission to consider is whether ar to what <br /> extent a hardcover vaziance is appropriate for the site: Plaiming Conuiiission should <br /> address: � <br /> -Wliether applicants should be granied a hardcover variance to be allowed to keep the <br /> pool, given that it is nonconforiizing and partially in tlie 0-75' zone, and that it is �lie <br /> priiilary reason for excess hardcover on tlie site... <br /> � -Wliether a hardcover variance sliould be granted for the 75-250' zone, given tliat this is <br /> considered as a total rebuild on a lot tllat is nearly conforiiling in widtli a.nd has a <br /> substantial hardcover allotment for the 75-250' zone... <br /> - Wheilier there is auy issue witli attacliiiig house to the existing garage that is slightly <br /> too close to the lot line... <br />