My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-19-2007 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2007
>
03-19-2007 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/19/2012 4:41:09 PM
Creation date
6/19/2012 4:40:41 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
529
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF TZiE <br /> ORONO PLANN7I�TG COlYIMZSSION ` <br /> A'Ionday,November 20,2006 <br /> . 6:00 o'cIocl:p.n�. <br /> Bremer stated in lier o�inion there�vas good public notice given Uut that she�vould Ue willing to table the <br /> application based on the conin�ents of Steve 7ohnston. <br /> Gaffi•on inquired wheiher the distance of the people being notified should be increased. Gaffi•on stated . <br /> the City requires a 350-foot notificalion. <br /> Bretiler stated she does not Icnow if that was not suf�cient iiz this case,but�vould not be opposed to <br /> sending out�ublic notice to a��ider area given the densiiy, � <br /> Gaffion stated all the le�al notices are handed to the police department aild they are supposed to be�osted <br /> at the sanZe time that the notices are sent out, Gaffron stated le;al iiotice is posted at the Long Lalce Post <br /> Office. Gaffron indicated he���ould aslc ihe police departulent�a�hetlzer the notices are getting postec�. <br /> Bremer inquired whether there is also�iiotice�iven in the ne�vs�aper, <br /> Gaffron stated there is also notice given in the newspaper. <br /> ICempf stated he is ilot op}�osed io tabling tlie a�plicatioii and that he is not opposed to some#ype of retail <br /> on this site. ' <br /> Iiroeger stated this is a city-wide issue aild sug�ested the local papers vv�ite an article coiicerning ihe <br /> suUject. ICroeger siated this application involves a major decision of the City concerning that area and <br /> tliat it would be beneficial to have as niany people�rovide input as�ossiUle. <br /> ICeml�f asked�vhether a PUD ��rould require fiirtller restrictions or the B-6�iistrict. <br /> Gaffroil sfiated ivith a planned unit development�roc�ss the City has soine fletibility in�vorlcing with the <br /> developer on the various issues as�vell as density. Gaffi•on stated the Stonebay development rvas a <br /> �lanned ttnit develo.pment. State st�tutes require that there be some consistency bei�veen the City's <br /> zoniiig and the Comprehensive Plan alid that the City Attoiziey has reconunended ihe area Ue zoned as <br /> close as l�ossible to ihe type of dishict that it is guided for in tlle Comprehensive Plan. <br /> Johnston noted a PUD requires a four-fifilts vote, evhicli gives the City even more conh�ol over the <br /> develol�inent, . _ <br /> P:�GL 39 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.