Laserfiche WebLink
MINUT�S OF TA� <br /> ORONO PLANNTNG COMAUSSIO�T y <br /> Ndonday,l�Tovember 20,2006 <br /> 6:00 o'clocic p.m. <br /> 1. Tlie original guiding for office rvith"miiior retail and service uses allowed only as accessory uses <br /> to the of�ce use"might need additional detail added to describe e:cactly what accessory uses are; <br /> 2. - Some of the parameters established for retail in 2004 might be applicable to au office <br /> development on the site and should Ue retained; such as tlie requirement for orientation to ihe stoiznwater <br /> pond as an ainenity,the lirnits on building sizes or architectural styles, etc. <br /> Procedurally, ihis CMP Amendment requires approval of the IVletropolitan Council. However,this is � <br /> . expected to be viewed as a nlinor atnendment,�vill have no new or un�laru�ed-for im�acts on <br /> lnetropolitan facilities, and is not e,cpected to be met witli any resistance Uy ihe Meh o�olitan Couiicil. <br /> Gaffroii stated the issues for coi�sid�xafion Uy the Plamling Connnission include; <br /> 1. Does the Planning Conunission a�ee rvith ihe Council's intent to rehuz� to the fonner�rovisions <br /> of tlie CMP�vith regards to Outlot A? <br /> 2. Are there any specific elements of the original CMP language (first part of E�hiUit A of <br /> Resohrtion No., 5190)that should be revised or clari�ed rvith this aillendment? <br /> 3. Planning Coinnlission should consider whether there are any negative im�acts to�roceeding with <br /> a rezoning of the sifie to match the CMP. - <br /> Staff and the City Attorney reconunend that Out1oC A Ue rezoned to B-G PUD with referei�ce to a Uasic <br /> undeveloped sui��ey of the property as the approved developnleizt�lan. The rezoning would Ue st�•uctured <br /> so that an amendment of the B-6 PUD zoning�vould be required for any development plan proposed for <br /> the site. I�i this���ay,tlie B-61'UD zoniug becomes hhe 1lolding zone and fihis�vould allo���for the zoning <br /> and comp plan to be consiste»t as required Uy State Statule. <br /> Gaffi-on noted he received i���o oPihe l�ublic notices back toclay fi•om Dahlstrom Developn�ent,LLC, and <br /> Joluz Ten•ance Homes, LLC. Althou�h the Ciiy's notices���ere sent con•ectly,the for�varding of their mail <br /> by the United States Postal Service had e�pired. Gaffi•on stated Staff did receive an e-mail today from the <br /> �•oup That o�ims the l�roperty�iskin?for, one,notice c�f the ncxt i�ublic hearing and;t�vo, taUling the <br /> �'�.��37 <br />