Laserfiche WebLink
15�NiJ'F'ES OF'I'� <br /> . O�Oiat� C�7CX CO�JI�C�I,NIEETYNG <br /> 1l�onday, Septembei•25,2006 <br /> 7:00 o'clock p.au, <br /> (6. #06-3212 HEMI'.�'L PRO.PERT�ES, D UTLOT A STONEBAY(Nl�CORNER OF 1�ILLOW <br /> DRIV.�IVORTHfi1l�I)HIG.�Ii6%41�12), Co�ztiniced) <br /> Brokl stated one of the options available to the ap�licants tonight or at the next meeting is that the <br /> applicants could ailzend their application to request a reguiding of the site to of�ce use,with the condition <br /> that there would be no retail component. Brokl stated under the City's cuirent comprehensive plan,retail <br /> uses are pernlitted, which would require an RPUD approval process. The applicants would still need a <br /> RPUD since the site is still zoned residential. Brok1 stated the applicants could argue in the future for the <br /> retail component but they would be able to pursue the office conlponent at the present time under that <br /> option. � . <br /> � Sansevere inquired whether the developer would be willing to construct just the medical com�onent <br /> without the retail. <br /> � Young stated they would not be interested in�ufting a Uuilding on this site until they had some tenants for <br /> the structure and that in their opinion,based on the present market,the retail component would be a draw. <br /> Mnrphy moved,lPeterson seconded,A.pplication#05-3212,Hempel Properties/John Terrance <br /> ff�oxnes, Outlot A,Stonebay,to deny the Comprehensive Plan Amendment. <br /> Gaffron stated if the comprehensive plan amendment were deiued,the site would still require a pharmacy. <br /> Murphy stated he would like the Council to undo what was previously approved for this site, <br /> Brokl stated the City could proceed forward with the rezoning and reguiding of this site if fihey so choose <br /> but that the City would need to provide notice to the property owner. <br /> Sansevere inquired whether the applicants would like this application tabled. <br /> Kerznack inquired what the next step would be if the appIication is tabled. <br /> Sansevere stated it is unlikely that the comprehensive plan amendmeilt approved a couple of years ago <br /> could be redone by the next council n�eeting. Sansevere stated tabling their a�plication would give the <br /> a�plicants some time to revise their plans to only propose office for this site. ' <br /> VOT�: Ayes 5,Nays 0. <br /> � *7. #06-3214 RUDY 1'VICKLA,N!)ER T�[OMJES,INC.,3345 CRYSTAL BAY ROAD— <br /> VAI2][ANCIES—l[tESOLUTION NO. 5515 <br /> White moved,Murphy seconded,to adopt RESOLUTgON NO. 5515, a Resolution granting <br /> variances for the property located at 3345 Crystal Bay Road. VOTE: Ayes 5,Nays 0. <br /> *8. #06-3219 LDSON SPENCER, 1135 SIPRIPVG HTLL ROA.D—SUBDIVISION—FINAL <br /> PLAT—RES�LUTION NO. 5516 <br /> White moved,Murphy seconded,to aclopt RESOLUTION NO. 5516, a Resolution Appr.oving tl�e <br /> Plat of Spencer Addition. �OTE: Ayes 5,Nays 0. <br /> ' PAG�6of14 <br />