Laserfiche WebLink
� NIINUTES OF THE <br /> � ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> Tuesday,February 20,2007 � <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> • (#07-3251 Mandeep Sodhi;Continued) <br /> Zullo stated she would like to see the portion of the deck that is in violation of the building code be <br /> removed. , <br /> Mrs. Sodhi stated it was not their intent to violate any building codes and that they were just <br /> attempting to replace what was there previously at a slightly reduced size. <br /> Rahn stated he would be in support of the five foot rule. <br /> � Sodhi asked whether they would be allowed to conshuct a seating place in another location if the deck <br /> were pulled back five feet. � <br /> Rahn stated Staff would have to review the plan to determine whether it is acceptable. <br /> Zullo inquired whether hardcover would be an issue if the deck was expanded in another location. <br /> Kroeger stated it appears they are slightly over in the 75-250 foot zone. <br /> Turner stated the hardcover may actually have been reduced with the new deck and that thesapplicants <br /> � are in the process of clarifying that. Turner stated one reason for the narrowing of the deck was to <br /> gain additional light in the lower level. � <br /> Zullo stated she would be in favor of reducing it to five feet. <br /> Rahn opened the public hearing at 7:28 p.m. � . <br /> � There were no public comments regarding this application. <br /> Rahn closed the public hearing at 7:28 p.m. <br /> Zullo moved,Kroeger seconded,to recommend approval of Application#07=3251,Mandeep and <br /> Leisa Sodhi,4080 Dahl Road,granting of a five foot setback variance,subject to the deck being � <br /> reduced to meet a five foot setback. <br /> Kroeger recommended the applicants seriously consider acquiring some additional land from the . <br /> neighbor and do a lot line readjushnent,which would resolve the issues. - <br /> VOTE: Ayes 7,Nays 0. . <br /> PAGE 13 <br />