My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-19-2007 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2007
>
03-19-2007 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/19/2012 4:41:09 PM
Creation date
6/19/2012 4:40:41 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
529
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
� . � <br /> To: Orono Planning Commission <br /> From Williani&Mary Titler owners 4209 North Shore Dr <br /> Highmark Builders proposes to build a spec house on the lot at 4205 North Shore Drive. <br /> This lot adjoins our home at 4209 North Shore Dr on the East lot line. The builder has <br /> requested a hardcover variance of 610 sqr ft in the 75-250' zone and an average lakeshore <br /> setback variance. The hardcover is 19.6% more hardcover than allowed by code in the <br /> 75-250 zone. The declared hardship of the lot at 4205 is the utility easeinent that runs <br /> thru the 75-250 zone west to east. We strongly oppose any hardcover variance or average <br /> 111ceshore setback variance for building at 4205 for the following primary reasons: <br /> 1. Property can be put to reasonable use without a hardcover or average lakeshore <br /> setback variance. Therefore, the applicant does not meet the requirement of Code <br /> Sec. 78-123 (a)(1). <br /> � a. The proposed house can be built behind the easement <br /> b. A detached garage could be employed to reduce hardcover <br /> c. The house and garage could be designed to meet the hardcover <br /> requirement and still be larger than the Orono nunimuin standard <br /> 2. If the lot did not have the utility easement at all and the house was to be built <br /> without a hardcover vaiYance; as has been done for 3 newly built neighboring <br /> houses including ours; the house would be forced to be pushed toward the road 61 <br /> ft leaving it only 1.5 ft over the easement. <br /> � a. This shows that the proposed variance to alleviate the easernent hardship <br /> would be to give 61 ft of ext�a dliveway vs.just moving the house back <br /> 21.5 ft. . � <br /> 3. The proposal makes the claim that the"majority of the views will be blocked <br /> because of the location of the home at 4209"if the house is moved to the behind <br /> the easement location,but by default makes the argument that it is reasonable to <br /> more significantly block fihe view of our honze at 4209 North Shore Dr. The <br /> rough dimensions are as follows: - <br /> a. If 4205 is built behind the easement it would be roughly 20 ft back of the <br /> furthest lakeside point of our house and about 23 ft east. <br /> b. If 4205 is built where proposed it would be roughly 48.5 ft in front of the <br /> most forward part of our house and 23 ft east. <br /> i. Clearly if the "Majority" of views" are to be blocked, scenario b <br /> allows for a greater"majority" to be blocked. (See pics 1 &2) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.