Laserfiche WebLink
#07-3250 L <br /> Februnry 15,2007 � <br /> . Ps�ge 4 of 5 <br /> . . �. <br /> Signage � <br /> A proposed design for a monuinent sign was slibmitted for review at the January meeting. The <br /> subject property is allowed 190 s.f. of signage, based on the Cocie standard of"aggregate square <br /> footage of sign space per lot shall not exceed the sum of oiie square foot for each fi•ont foot of <br /> � bLiilding, phis one square foot for each front foot of lot not occttpied by a building". The front . <br /> footage of the site is 190 feet along Highway 12, permitting a total amount of monument and <br /> building signage of 190 squa.re feet conibined. The proposed sigii has two faces, each with a <br /> face of 90 s.f., being 5' high and 18' in length. This sign nieets Orono's monlunent sign <br /> standards; however, the metho�l of `backliglzting' �aoterl o�a t/ae plan is cc�icle�r anrl slaocrl�l be <br /> clarifierl by t/te appliccrnt. Also wlaat is t/ie pccrpose for t/te ligltt fxture above one e�ztl of t/ae <br /> sign? <br /> Based on tlus monuinent sign, the only signage that will be available for the individual iuiits <br /> would be a nameplate of about 1 square foot per unit, WIlIC�l SYlOL11Cl IlOt be clri 1SSLle S121C8 tI11S 1S <br /> not a retail site. � <br /> Lighting ' <br /> . A revised lighting plan has been submitted reflecting the site plan revisions, showing pole and <br /> wall-mount locations, fixture details, and foot-candle measurements. It appears that all fixtures <br /> � are shielded as required by City code. <br /> Building Quality &Materials, • ' <br /> The applicants submitted a colored renderiiig of the building elevation illustrating the proposed <br /> exterior finish materials. We have suggested they again bring samples of the materials and <br /> colors to be used. All mechaiucal equipinent will be located in the interior rather than on the <br /> roof. � <br /> City Engineer's Comments <br /> Please review the City Engineer's comments in Exhibit B. Specific items that the applicants' <br /> should address to the satisfaction of the Platuung Coinmission uiclude: <br /> • Will applicant agree to provide a 50' wide easement over tlie southerly coiulecting <br /> driveway,ratller than the 25' shown? . <br /> • Can the applicaiit provide written consent�of filie adjoining property owner to �llow the <br /> walls to be built on tlie welding shop property? <br />� • Can the applicant gain temporary construction easenlents over the adjoining properties <br /> for retaining wa11 construction? <br /> • The road coruiection to the west stops short of the lot line - will applicant make this <br /> ' drivable to the satisfaction of the Fire Marshal? <br /> •' Are there atly line items in the City Eiigineer's coinineilts that applicalit believes caruiot <br /> be satisfactorily addressed? � <br />