Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE � , <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION . <br /> Monday,September 18,2006 <br /> . G:00 o'clock p.m. • . ' <br /> (#06-3232 Michael and Mn�y Drazan,Coniinued) • <br /> Rahn siated it is difficult to comment on 1n application when there have baen changes made to a plan and <br /> the plan does not reflect ihose changes. <br /> � Michlel Drazan st�ted the originll plan contained the retai»ing wall, which was not their intent,and that <br /> they submiii:ed the revised plan to show the elimination of the retaining w111. <br /> R1hn noted the Planning Commission is also lacking the comments of the City Cngineer. <br /> Kroeger inquired whether the retaining walls consist of the 13.9 percent hardcover in the 0-75 fooi zone. <br /> Michael. Drazan indicated that consists of the deck and the retaining wall. . <br /> Curtis noted a po��tion of the residence is also within the 0-75 foot zone. <br /> Jurgens inquired whether the lakeside deck would be removed. . <br /> Michael. Drazan indicated the deck is embedded in the stairs and that they were not planning on ren�oving <br /> the deck. . <br /> Jurgens stated the rock walkway,the timber planters, and other nonessential hardcover shou(d�be . <br /> removed. <br /> Mary Drazan stated they have not addressed the 0-75 foot setback zone at this time due to a couple of <br /> issues. Drazan noted they liave lost approximately two feet of lakeshore and that they are planning to put <br /> better rip-rap in that area to prevent fiirther erosion. Drazan stated they did not include that in their plans <br /> , because they were not informed on the City's position regarding that aspect and that they would prefer to <br /> address that in the future. <br /> Bremer stated lhe Planning Commission likes to look at properties as a whole and that all nonessetltial <br /> hardcovec within the 0-75 foot setback would be required to be retnoved. Bremer recommended the <br /> applicant look at the 0-75 foot setback zone to determine wliat is essential hardcover. <br /> Michael Dcazan stated the deck attaches to a retaining waU underneath �►nd that the timbecs have sta��ted to <br /> rot and need to be replaced. ' <br /> Rahn stated the City�i�gineer could determine��vhether tlie cetaining walls within the 0-75 foot zone are <br /> necessary for erosion control. � . <br /> Jurgens stated the 0-75 foot zone should be addressed �t this time rather than at some point in tlie fulure. <br /> Curtis noted she did �dvise the applicai�ts to wait on the work in the 0-75 foot setbaek and that it is the <br /> intent of the 1�plicl»ts to come back sometime in ihe spring with a proposal. <br /> � � PAG�20 <br />