Laserfiche WebLink
_ FILE#07-3262 � <br /> � 15 February 2007 <br /> Page 5 of 5 <br /> considered with this applicatinn? ' <br /> • Are there any oiher issues or concerns with this application? <br /> St�►ff Recommend�tion � <br /> Staff recognizes that a 50' buffer would essentially take up all of the usable yard on the <br /> property and some of the existing home, however it woulci not be unreasonable to <br /> compromise and create a buffer of some �ype on this property. Staff recominends thai <br /> John Smyth of Bonestroo be allowed to review and comment on the applicants' plans. <br /> While Plaruiing Staff recommends approval of a some level of hardcover variances in . <br /> conjunction with this project, the levels .requesfied may not be reasonable. Planning � <br /> Commission should discuss the additional requiremeni of the lake setback on the easfiern <br /> portions of the lot and whether or not the hardcover as requested is reasonable. . <br /> If the Planning Commission feels that there is hardship with respect to the location of the <br /> � existing home and it is a reasonable reqliest of the applicants' to preserve the personal � <br /> historical v11ue of the existing 1�ome staff will support some level of hardcover and <br /> setback variances to allow additions. Additionally, staff will not support a height variance <br /> and staff would recommend the applicants submit revised plans reflecting the third level <br /> as a half-story as allowed. The applicants should be required to address all of the City's <br /> � engineering concerns in Tom Kellogg's letter(Exhibit I'). <br /> l <br /> J <br />