My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-20-2007 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2007
>
02-20-2007 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/19/2012 4:09:29 PM
Creation date
6/19/2012 4:09:12 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
346
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
� #07-3259 1374 Rest Point Road <br /> February 15,2007 ' <br /> Page 7 <br /> 3. Should the pool be allowed to reinain, in conjunction with what is functionally a total <br /> rebuild? Is there any justification for a hardcover variance in either zone? It can be <br /> argued that the pool is the sole reason for the hardcover variances needed,'and it is likely <br /> that the proposed house with some slight location and design modifications could be <br /> constructed and att�ched to the garage without tlie need for any vaxiances other than the <br /> 9.1' existing garage setback. With over 4500 s.f.of hardcover allowance,the lot certainly <br /> has the ability to contain the proposed 2250 s.f. of house and garage and the t�iple-wide <br /> 850 s.f. of existing driveway,phis a few other amenities. <br /> 4. Does Plamung Commission have any concerns about connecting the house to the garage <br /> when the garage has a slightly substandard side setback? <br /> Staff Recommendation � <br /> Pla.iming Coirunission should provide applicant with direction regard'uig the variety of concerns <br /> noted in tlus memo, addressiiig: � <br /> 1. Whether tlus should be considered as a total rebuild... <br /> 2. Whether there is justification based on the extent of tlie project to require a conforming <br /> � (30') street setback instead of allowing a second story at the 18' setback... <br /> 3. Whether applicants should be granted a hardcover variance to be allowed to keep the <br /> pool, given that it is nonconforming and partially in the 0-75' zone, and that it is the <br /> priinary reason for excess hardcover on the site... <br /> 4. Whether a hardcover variance should be granted for the 75-250' zone, given tliat this is a <br /> total rebuild�on a lot that is nearly conforming in width and has a substantial haxdcover <br /> allotment for the 75-250' zone... � <br /> 5. Whether there is any issue with attachiiig house to the existiiig garage that is slightly too <br /> close to the lot line... <br /> Given the above, and given the City �ngineer's concerns wiih the grading plan aud fouiidation <br /> • information,provide the applica.izts with as inuch direction as possible aild table the application for <br /> appropriate revisioiis aiid/or additional information. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.