|
��c rl����T � .I>
<br /> ���. .
<br />:, . .
<br /> � 6. � #07-3254 METROBiTILDING CO.,940 NORTH ARM DRIVE,VARIANCE,7:55-8:26 �
<br />,,,::� . : � . , .
<br />�;::;°��: - � P.M. � , •
<br /> �.. .: . .
<br /> � Joe Leintz,Contractor,was present. � �
<br /> � Curtis stated the applicant is requesting an average lakeshoce setback vaciance and hardcover variances in �
<br /> ' ' . � .• : . . � .. �;F���f G3F • . ' -,
<br /> conjunction with an addition to the existing home. Curtis stated she lias outl7ned the new portions in blue
<br /> . . . �ax F t ��-r h��}• .
<br /> ���'- `�� �''������'��'4F�
<br /> � ' . .' . Y� 4. (Z"f'4�..�^� f ' � �
<br /> .. on the overhead,with the existing home being depicted rin.;black. �'�F�_�,�;:= a�s���; ,
<br /> !°�`'}�'S� �x Y�6 i �V J� �s '�j'� ' .
<br /> (' ., . �9*9 4 i4' aH'xy�1 { ' . .
<br /> � ,. Leintz pointed out one of the decks that was existing but has si«ce'beei�removed�� ��``�� ��� ��,. . � . �
<br /> . ' �s�"�4#-T'i3�s�a r�.c����r `x�t;'������F°�S k\}�7 .
<br /> k}he�' F,� "� �t�" ��t ����-?"�r� �e.�� . . . '
<br /> � Curtis stated the property is located on a curved bay like,shore1ine a��d the home �s entcrely ahead of the � .
<br /> . ' ' , �k� 4{�.��}rt,�s�tEY�' 1 W�'L� Y��. . ,
<br /> � � . �:a.Yrosl�.M�'9p.�;j P.,.w y�vr � . .
<br /> , �; average lakeshore setback line. The applicant would ltke°ta reinove the existuig attached garage and �� � .
<br /> • . �• '�i, �hix„35e�,�v2� . . . . .
<br /> �, y n'Fy t
<br /> { x� .. � �. �ly`��Eu 5+�<,�'�,i, . • .
<br /> > construct an addition approximately five feet fiirtlier fromthe lake than the existing attached garage and � �
<br /> yA{ � ,-y�d � . � Y� �� fi4,t3.�'�'"' ,
<br /> 5� � . . . . t �$�dtS_k §.�5 Y� t * � � �t�t �,"T
<br /> . . {Y 'M }i�,7 %TF:.� � ^4��'w's`Y .
<br /> add more square footage to the home more str'ee�tward��-����u�;��� ��
<br /> r ' ����,y+t�.n�` ��;'�w��.�n.�,�w�°�a""'�'
<br /> �' ��� r#v.r �, '� s�rg�'�>�e
<br /> ' � Staff supports the average lakeshore setbackFuariance�eguest'�However„Staff recommends a reduction of
<br /> � . .,. . • . S"{y`.,�� �-h�,.��a� �va.�fii`.°s�,,'�'�'t�4�}� . ..
<br /> �4j�;� . y I,T' Pb9 at � . .
<br /> ..... . . ��� d_ M1y �p' �_� F.�S,��'�(C; . . � .
<br /> � the existillg/proposed porch, a reduj}cti.�o`n./�m, tlie nonsfruchiral hardcover on the properly as well as removal� . _�
<br /> � .. .. .: .' .� „L^W�5"S�—°�' W�-���R�����.'L4i'� �� . ' .
<br /> ' ���.3�'_.k+r "��Y� r��f,Y�. i� u,�,SU� . .,
<br /> � of the proposed lakeside deck and pro�p,osed porch as theyRbofh�encroach into tlle 0-75 foot zone. If the� �
<br /> "�� �x ,� .
<br /> _ �2ier:�� Y�1 : �'�`�.tt;..,�;��r` . "
<br /> ' ��-`applicant does not want to remoue tlte above listed items, Staff recommends that the applicatiou be tabled �
<br /> r . . �
<br /> • � - '.�.�{'' "�,���. , � � .
<br /> r 'k�7r�, �t"`ir� iY��,a-_�a3, • .
<br /> to allow the appiicant an.�op�ortun�iy=to�propose,fiirther hardcover removals and redesign the addition, .
<br /> � t'".. . � � � �;`���.,, }Y`�,�P��t�-��-��La A a s�"P ui "y� �.�y��"'`�r�j�°� , . , .
<br /> .3 •� ��,.. .> �.�•M 5�..,� `�� �.��.,� �.. ���::
<br /> � , ; ; . � decks,and,porches"toutessen�l�e i�pact on tEie 75 foot setback. Additionally the City Engineer has not . � .
<br /> .. . ���r.:T.i�' . . 'lv��� �-h+R,�7�„a� 'k�'�„`"�. . ' .
<br /> • � 3 ��.:'� L;;��p�'a�, .,��'�� �' •
<br /> h�p•ad an opportunity to commeri��on;p fhe(�current proposaL Staff would like to give the City Engineer the �
<br /> � . �(r I#,S'4'Y ! �.y.Yq �..P'C , • ..
<br /> ' �f3Sf' Tvi�+ py`��� . . .
<br /> ehance fo;comment on tlie current pla,n.,�.,and on any subsequent plans prior to fiirther Planning .
<br /> ��k��,;�'r �� � ��Y`r{��,� •• , ' . .
<br /> . '�`5E �va}� �{k � �1'�J��. � '
<br /> >> Commission or Council review�( �Plannmg Staff recommends tabli�ig the application for revisions. . �
<br /> �F� `�-� �A� �.,Y�$^l� ����y •
<br /> ��F. � � ..� . `.�i.{ti 4�'Yi ;?� $Z.��yc�nrF C"'���#�S'�rt�,�� ,' � .. . .
<br /> Leiiitz stated theyswouldtl�kepfo take the hardcover area that existed toward the middle of the house and
<br /> . . ryk x ty.r � a.¢�t� �wi' . � . . , .
<br /> . Srt.��,.�$�:,^et/w$,��x �e:µ''� . , : . ..
<br /> convert it to screen porch��enrtz indicated they would be willing to reduce some of the other hardcover � . .
<br /> , .
<br /> .�on the lot and woiild be.redesigniilg the driveway. � .. ` ; : . �
<br /> I�Rahu stated in liis opinion tl�is property is way over on hardcover and that there should be further� �
<br /> reditctions made. Rahn suggested reduciiig the driveway and liaving a turnaround. Rahn stated in i�is . . :
<br /> _.:: • .. ., -
<br /> . :: �.. . . . . ., . . . .
<br />..: . _ , ,. . .
<br />
|