Laserfiche WebLink
. - <br /> ' FILE#07-3254 - <br /> � 9 January 2007 <br /> ' Page 4 of 4 <br /> rurther, the existing home encroaches up to 7' into the 75' zone. While ihere is little to � <br /> . be done �bout this encroachment, staFf does not feel that allowing fiirther encroachment, <br /> be it with a deck, porch and patio are appropriate. � <br /> Issues for Consideration <br /> ` 1. Does tlie Plamiing Commission feel that the proposeci hardcover reductions are <br /> suff cient? <br /> 2. Are tllere any other issues or concerns with this application? <br /> St�ff Recommend�tion <br /> Staff supports the average lakeshore setback varilnce request, however Staff <br /> recommends a reduction of the existing/proposed porch, a reduction in fihe non-structural <br /> hardcover on the property as well as removal of the proposed lakeside deck and proposed <br /> - porch (south) as they boih encroach into the 0-75' zone. If the applicant does iiot want to <br /> remove the above listed items StafF recommends that the application be tabled to allow <br /> the applicant an opporhtnity to propose fiirther hardcover removals and redesign the <br /> addition, decks, and porches to lessen the impact on the 75' setback. Adclitionally, Tom <br /> Kellogg has not had an opportunity to comment on the current proposal. Staff would like <br /> to give Kellogg the chance to comnzent on the current plan and on any subsequent plans <br /> prior to further Plaruliiig Commissioii or Council review. <br /> . ' 4 <br />