Laserfiche WebLink
' FILE#07-3254 • _ <br /> ' � 14 February 2007 <br /> Page 4 of 4 <br /> Issues for Consicieration • � <br /> 1. ' Does the Planning Commission Feel that the proposecl h�rdcover reductioiis are . . <br /> • sufficieni? � <br /> � 2. Does the Plainling Commission feel that ihe applicant addressed all of fihe - <br /> concei�ns outlined at the January meeting? <br /> 3. Are there any other issues or coiicerns with this 1p�lication? � <br /> Staff Recommendation � : <br /> While Staff would prefer that the applic�nt provide for a confornling hardcover level <br /> within the 75'-250' zone which could be accomplished by removing fihe detached garage, . � <br /> � , the driveway to the detached garage,the pool and some other miscellaneous hardcover, it � <br /> may be more reasonable that the applicant revise the request to result in a 75' —250' zone <br /> hardcover level at or below what currently exists . . <br /> ' Additionally, while Staff could supporl an average Iakeshore setback variance request for � � : <br /> an addition, it�appears that the entire home is to be rebuilt. With such a nonconforming <br /> location and hardcover Sta�recommends that Plaruling Commission consider,wheiher it � <br /> . is more appropriate that the plans be revised to show a new home in a conforming. <br /> location. � � • � <br /> . ' 4 , <br />