Laserfiche WebLink
� FILE#07-3254 . <br /> . 14 February 2007 <br /> Page 2 of 4 <br /> L. <br /> Setbacks: � <br /> LR-1B Re uired Existin Pro osed � � <br /> Rear 30' � �9.5' detached garage �40' <br /> � 160' existin home <br /> Nort11 Sicle 10' � 24' No Chan e . � <br /> South Side l0' 35' 14' . <br /> " Lakesliore 75' 70' home 65' ro osed deck <br /> Average Lakeshore The majority of the eaisting home and almost the entire proposed lddition � � <br /> are lakeward of the avera e (akeshore setback. <br /> � Structur�l Covera�e: � <br /> Total Lot Area � Total Structural Cover� e <br /> 42,420 s.f. (0.97 acre) . Allowed: 6,363 s.f. (15%) � <br /> . � � Pro osed: 5,835 s.f. (13.7%) <br /> Hardcover. Calculations: �'. �� <br /> (Reviser102.09.07) ' <br /> Hardcover Zone Total Area in Allowed Existing proposed � <br /> � Zone Hardcover Hardcover Hardcover <br /> . � .0—75 10 040 s.f. 0 s.f 1,266 s.f.* 625 s.f. <br />. . ' (0%) (12%) (6.2%) <br /> � . 75—250 � 27 920 s.£ 6,980 s.f. 9,287 s.f.* l 0,917 s.f. . <br /> . � ' (25%) (33%) (39.1%) , <br /> - 250—500 1,338 s.f. 755 s.f.* 755 s.f. <br /> 4,460 s.f. . � (30%) (17%) (17%) <br /> * After exclusioil of fabric or plastic-lined landscape beds � � � <br /> ---------------------------------------------------.----:---------------------------- <br /> Lake Setback,Average Lakeshore Setback & Hardcover Variance Analysis � <br /> � � The existing home is siivated almost entirely lakeward of the average lakeshore setback <br /> line. It appears that due to tlle unique lot shapes, existing vegetation, and orienfiation to <br /> the lake and the topography of the homes; there may not be much lake view imp�et from ' <br /> the existing home. The proposal includes removing the existing home down to the cap of <br /> . the foundation and rebuilding on that existing fotindation. The applicant has revised <br /> - rooflines of the northern portion of the ilome in �n effort to reduce the impact the home , <br /> will have on the views of fihe lake enjoyed by the neighbors to the north. Additionally, <br /> the applicant has revised the lakeside decks so that there will be less of an impact on the . . <br /> . existing substaudard lake setback. The proposed new structural additions are on ilie <br /> ' streei side of the home with the exception of the proposed deck and tlie proposed porch. <br /> The subject property's 75'-250' ll�rdcover allow�nce is substaniial at 6,890 s.f., however <br /> the existing and �-evised proposed levels far exceed the allowed amount afi 10,917 s.£. . . <br /> The in-grouiid pool, relatively large fooiprint of the home, detached garage and <br /> . considerable drivew�y hardeover all contribute to the 39.1% proposed 75' — 250' <br /> . 2 <br />