Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br /> � ORONO PLANNING COIVIMISSION <br /> Tuesday,January 16,2007 � � � <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.tn. <br /> (#07-3250 Philip Carlson,Continued) , <br /> Zullo stated she has some concem regarding the drainage behind the buildings and that she would like to <br /> see the location of the dum�sters revisited by the ap�licanfis. Zullo stated she would also like to have � <br /> more infonnation on the access provided. � . � <br /> Gaffron stated the layout cunently does not eliminate the possibility of extending the service road. <br /> Zullo inquired whether the one service road would nieet Fire Code. ' ' <br /> Gaffi-on siafied the�re marshal has not reviewed this latest plan but did not have a proUlem with the <br /> � previous�roposal that was similar to this. Gaffron noted the buildings would have sprinkler systems <br /> installed. <br /> Kempf su�gested two siiialler dumpsters be considered in two se�arate locations. <br /> Rahn closed the public hearing at 7:42 p.rii. <br /> Kempf moved,Winer seconded,to table Application#07-3250,Philip Carlson,Interspace-West, <br /> Inc.,Ainber Woods Office Center,LLC,2060 Wayzata Boulevard West,PUD, Commercial Site <br /> Plan. VOTE: Ayes 7,Nays 0. . • <br /> . � (itecess takeu at 7:43—7:48 p.m.) � <br /> 5. #07-3253 JENivIFER AND CAARLIE COGBILL, 1590 LONG LAKE BOULEVARD, � <br /> � VA.RIANCE,7:48 P.M.—7:56 P.M. <br /> . Mark Earhart, Contractor, and Charlie CogUill,A�plicant,were�resent. � <br /> � Curtis stated the a�plicant is requesting a side-yard setback variance to allow a 21-foot setUack where a <br /> 30-foot setback is normally required in order to consiruct an additioii to the existing hoine. <br /> The existing home has an existiizg staircase to the basement level, which is exhemely challenging, unsafe, <br /> and at 2', 7"wide, does not meet the building code requirenient for a legal staircase. The applicants are <br /> proposing to consiruct a 5'10"x 24' one-stoiy addition to acconuiiodate the new legal staircase. <br /> While Staff finds there is a hardship for a variance from the side yard setback requirement of 30 feet, <br /> Staff would n�ake the arguuieut that allowing for the minimum of a 3-foot wide staircase and an addition <br /> to accomn�odate that at four feet as o�posed to the six-foot addition as proposed would Ue reasonable. <br /> This addition would result in a side setback of 23.6 feet as opposed to the 21.6 feet�roposed. The <br /> resulting side setUack would not be out of character with the nei�l�Uorhood. <br /> , PAGE 12 <br />