Laserfiche WebLink
. � �� . <br /> � ��� � <br /> �.3:�, �CI'I'�' �►� �I��11T� <br /> � ,.:,. � <br /> '�► , A�i,. ��„ . <br /> RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> ��`9 4�'�'G NO, � � ���� <br /> �ESI3� <br /> FTNDINGS <br /> 1. This application was re��ie�ved as Zoning File#04-3012. <br /> 2 The property is located in the LR-lA, Single Faniily Lalceshore Residential <br /> District, which requires a nlinimum lot area of 2 acres and miniinum l.ot rvidth <br /> of 200'. The ai•ea of t11e property is 3.3 acres (144,491 s.f.) and defined lot <br /> �vidth is 650'+, � <br /> 3. The Plaiuiing Comu�ission revie�ved this application at a public hearing held on <br /> � May 17, 2004 and recommended approval of a hardcover variance �vithin the 0- <br /> 75' setbacic zo�le of �3S s.f, for a boardwalk and landing, a conditional use <br /> • pern�it for cliimney heights i« excess of�30'; and a conditional use pennit and <br /> variance for grading; f ll and a retainin� wall located within the flood fringe <br /> � based on the following findings: • <br /> a. The applicant will conduct grading aild filling below 931.5 MSL within the <br /> flood frizlge, consistiilg of constntction of a retainiiig �vall, excavation and <br /> mitigation as depicted oil Exlubit B approved by the City&�gineer. <br /> b. The ap�licai�t �vill comply with the reconunendations of tlle City Engineer <br /> . and the MiiZnehaha Creelc V4�atershed District Rule C peimit # 04-210 <br /> regarding floodplain fillii�g and mitigation. <br /> c. The applicani will comply �vitll Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-1117, <br /> st�ndards for floodway and flood fi-inge conditional uses. <br /> � � d. The applicant has proposed an enviroiunentally friendly native floodplaiil . <br /> shoreline area as opposed to the existinc maintained ]awn extendi.ng to the <br /> lake. <br /> e. The chimneys at a heiaht of 40' 3" will have no i�e�ative visual impacts <br /> �ttithin the nei�hborhood and as an architectural feature will not be out of <br /> cllaracter within the neighborhood. <br /> 4. The Plannin� Commission revie�ved tl�e a��plication at a public hearing held on <br /> May 17, 2004 and recommended denial of the fence request wiihin 75' of the <br /> OH�VL based on the follo4ving findings: <br /> Page 2 of C <br />