Laserfiche WebLink
: FILE#07-3254 <br /> 9 January 2007 <br /> Page 4 of 4 <br /> rurtlier, the existing honle encroaclies ltp to 7' into the 75' zone. While iliere is little to � <br /> be done lbout this encroachment, staff does not feel that allowing fiirther encroachment, <br /> be it with a deck, porch 1nd paiio are appropriate. - <br /> Issues for Cons'rderltion - <br /> 1. Does the Planning Commissioil feel that the proposed harcicover reductions are <br /> sufficient? . <br /> 2. Are there any oiher issues or concerns with this application? <br /> - St�ff Recommendation � <br /> Sfiaff supports the average lakeshore setback variance requesi, howevei: Staff <br /> � recommends a reduction of the exisfiing/proposed porch, a reduction in the non-structural <br /> hardcover on the property as well as removal of ihe proposed lakeside deck and proposed <br /> porch (sottth) as tliey boih encroach into the 0-75' zone. If the applicant does not w�►nt to <br /> . remove the above listed items Sfiaff recommends fihat the application be tabled to allow <br /> the appliclnt an opporh►nity to propo.se further hardcover removals and redesign the <br /> addition, decks, and porches to lessen the impact on the 75' setback. Additionally, Tom <br /> Kellogg has not had an opporhinity to coinment on the current proposal. Staff would like <br /> � to give Kellogg the chance fio comment on the current plan and on any subsequent plans <br /> � prior to fiirther Planning Commission or Council review. <br /> 4 <br />