Laserfiche WebLink
. #07-3250 <br /> JAnuary 11,2007 w <br /> Page 12 of 12 <br /> Staff Recommendation _ <br /> Staff would iiote that the application as of this writing is sti11 deemed as incoinplete. Staff <br /> � believes a ntuilber of p1a1i revisions and submittals are necessary to allow the City to deterinine <br /> whether the pla.0 as subnutted is feasible. The item should be tabled pending timely subinittal of <br /> additional informatioil. The applicant must provide the followiiig for review: <br /> 1. Preliminary Plat Drawing - showing the proposed lot lines, approximate dimensions, <br /> lot and blocic intmbers, etc. oil a copy of the site plan; and showing easenients to be <br /> vacated alid gratited. <br /> 2. Signage Plan - a dimensioned depiction of the proposed signage for the site, including <br /> site signage as well as individual building signage. <br /> 3. Building Fa�ade Materials Depiction and Listing - colored renderings of the proposed <br /> building facades and roof, proposed material types and colors, a.iid samples of those <br /> materials. ' • <br /> 4. Dumpster Enclosure Plan - a proposed screening/enclosure system for the dumpster. <br /> This should be designed to architecturally match the buildings. <br /> 5. Permits - copies of the N1iiDOT pernuts that have been issued, as well as copies of other <br /> agency pernuts received for this project. . <br /> 6. Access Just�cation - provide an engineering/transportation justification to show how � <br /> the driveway connection to the property to the west is functional for all expected <br /> vehicl�lar movements. <br /> 7. Address City Engineer's Comments - address each of the bullet points in the City <br /> Engineer's letter of January 10, 2007. A few additional comments regarding those points: <br /> a. Applicant has provided a retaizung wall desigii that appears to be only relevant to <br /> the walls at the noi-th end of the site, and suggests fihat the area needing to be <br /> excavated to accommodate those wa11s as near as 5' to the property boundary will <br /> extend into the adjoining property. This is uiiacceptable. Additionally, a separate <br /> design is izeeded for other walls oiz the site that are below parking areas... <br /> b. Plans have not yet been reviewed by the Fire Marshal. Plans will also be <br /> forwarded to MnDOT asid Herulepin County Public Works for review and <br /> cointnent. � <br /> Application Escrow. During 2006 the Ciiy conlmenced collectuig an Application Escrow for <br /> all comniercial and industrial developnient applications, to cover the total costs associated with <br /> review and approval of the proposed development,prior to tlie performance of any such services <br /> by City staff or consultants. Based on the costs incurred with the applicants' prior applications, <br /> an escrow aiilotult of$15,000 will be required prior to fiu-�her review of the applicatioii. <br /> . , <br />