Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br /> � ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> Monday,November 20,2006 <br /> 6:00 dclock p.m. <br /> (#06-3225 WBW,LLC,CONTINUED) <br /> Kempf concurred that he would not like to see a solid wall of trees along the Luce Line. <br /> Kroeger asked whether the power lines run along the Luce Line. <br /> Johnston stated they do run along the Luce Line and that the trees would be outside of the easement for <br /> the power lines. <br /> Rahn inquired whether the Fire Inspector has reviewed the plans. <br /> Gaffron stated at this point the�re and building inspectors have not reviewed the plans but they would <br /> prior to the Planning Commission meeting in January. <br /> Rahn inquired whether the buildings would be sprinkled. <br /> Johnston stated they would not be. Johnston stated there might be a concern with the last four units on <br /> the roadway and that it may be necessary to put the fire trucks in reverse. <br /> Bremer noted she did have a concern at the previous meeting regarding the layout of the driveways and <br /> that Lot 5 would have the tightest parking constraints. <br /> Johnston stated Lot 5 would have approximately 20 feet from the street to the garage. Johnston indicated <br /> the homeowner association documents would.cover some of the parking issues. <br /> Kempf and Kroeger commented that this proposal seems to be a good fit for the property. <br /> Gaffron noted this application would be back before the Planning Commission in January. <br /> Rahn suggested some elevations be submitted prior to the January meeting. <br /> Kempf moved,Kroeger seconded,to table Application#06-3225 David Carlson for 875 WBW LLC, <br /> 875 West Wayzata Boulevard,to the January Planning Commission meeting. VOTE: Ayes 4, <br /> Nays 0. <br /> 3. _ 06-3234& 06-3235 DAI�TIEL HESSBURG,4725 &4731 NORTH SHORE DRIVE, <br /> VARIANCE,6:35 P.M.—7:14 P.M. <br /> Daniel Hessburg,Applicant,was present. <br /> Gaffron noted this application was tabled at the October Planning Commission meeting in order for the <br /> applicant to respond to the Commission's various requests. The applicant has provided revisions to both <br /> the site plans and the proposed home plans in response to the Planning Commission's direction. <br /> PAGE 3 <br />