Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANIVING COMMISSION . <br /> Monday,November 20,2006 <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> (#06-3248 HOLLANDER, CONTINUED) <br /> Bremer indicated the Planning Commission would be making a formal motion on the application. <br /> Hollander stated the City is discriminating against him. <br /> Bremer inquired why the applicant stated the City could table his application earlier in the evening. <br /> Hollander stated he wanted the Planning Commissioners to have enough time to read his information <br /> thoroughly and that he would also like the City's attorney to review his affidavit. Hollander stated this <br /> situation is also causing him emotional distress and that the Planning Commission should thoroughly • <br /> review the situation. <br /> Bremer stated the Planning Commission is only a recommending body and that the applicant can plead <br /> his case to the City Council. ' . <br /> Hollander indicated he is aware of that. <br /> Bremer stated the City Council would have the benefit of all the notes and documents that the applicant • <br /> has referred to and that the applicant will then have another opportunity to present his case to the Council. <br /> Hollander stated he understands that and that typically the Orono City Council follows the <br /> recommendations of the Planning Commission. Hollander recommended the Planning Commission table <br /> his application to allow everyone time to review all the documentation prior to making a decision. <br /> Bremer stated the Planning Commission typically would table an application if it is incomplete. Bremer <br /> asked whether there is any additional information that the applicant would like to submit as part of his <br /> application. <br /> Hollander stated he feels his application is complete but that the Planning Commission may not have had <br /> sufficient time to review the information. <br /> Kroeger and Bremer indicated they have read the information. <br /> Bremer requested both affidavits be included as part of the record. <br /> Kempf moved,Kroeger seconded,#06-3248,200 Hollander Road,to recommend denial of the fence <br /> height variance. VOTE: Ayes 4,Nays 0. <br /> ` PAGE 28 <br />