My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/20/2006 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2006
>
11/20/2006 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/19/2012 2:53:26 PM
Creation date
6/19/2012 2:53:23 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMIVIISSION <br /> Monday,November 20,2006 <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> (#06-3239 VOGUE ICF HOMES, CONTINUED) <br /> VOTE: Ayes 4,Nays 1,Kroeger Opposed. <br /> Kroeger stated he was opposed to the hardcover variance due to the concerns expressed by the neighbors. <br /> 5. 06-3243 NORTH SHORE GARDENS ON BEHALF OF RICHARD MARZAN,2795 <br /> PHEASANT ROAD,CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT,8:05—8:57 P.M. <br /> Richard Marzan,Applicant,was present. <br /> Turner stated the applicant has submitted an as yet incomplete application for a conditional use permit for <br /> land alteration and retaining walls on a steep slope within the 75-foot lakeshore setback. The walls are <br /> proposed to address erosion and maintenance problems on a steep lakeshore. <br /> Turner illustrated the steep slope on the overhead,noting in all likelihood the slope was created at some <br /> point by a previous owner.The slope is too steep to plant trees and consists mainly of box elders. <br /> The existing house on the property was constructed in 2002 to replace an older house. The house did not <br /> require variances. Near the shoreline the property drops 24 feet in as little as 25 feet. The slope ranges <br /> from 1:1 under the large tree on the edge of the slope to about 2:1 at the steps. Much of the slope is about <br /> 1.5 to 1. <br /> In response to a recent complaint that the lakeshore had been clear-cut, Staff investigated this property <br /> and it was apparent that vegetation had been cut on a substantial portion of the slope. Photographs from <br /> the file show that trees had been cut,apparently recently, in the area above the retaining wall east to the <br /> large tree at the top of the slope. Except for some spruce and pine trees adjacent to the stairs,the trees on <br /> the slope are box elders. These trees are common on created or disturbed slopes where little else grows. <br /> The owner indicated he had the seller clean up the slope before he bought the property. It appears that <br /> they cut the box elders and the box elders have resprouted. The owner then had them trimmed again this <br /> year. This made the slope appear to be clear-cut. Prior to Staff contacting the properly owner,the <br /> property owner contacted the City requesting information about constructing retaining walls. <br /> The applicant proposes to construct two retaining walls,each ten feet high, across the lakeshore slope. In <br /> addition, a lower terrace eight feet wide and an intermediate tenace 17 feet wide would be created. The <br /> walls would be constructed of large blocks of stone. There would be two separate sets of stairs, one to the <br /> intermediate terrace and the second to the lower terrace. Retaining walls would be placed near the side <br /> lot lines so the existing grade on the adjacent properties could be maintained undisturbed. Ten feet <br /> behind the wall would be excavated to provide for placement of required fabric and soils. The application <br /> is incomplete because no grading plan was provided despite a specific request for one. <br /> The applicant has asserted that the retaining walls are the only way to address the slope. Cutting the bank <br /> down to create a 3:1 slope would move the top of the slope back to the 75-foot lakeshore setback and <br /> PAGE 12 � <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.