My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/16/2006 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
10/16/2006 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/19/2012 2:52:31 PM
Creation date
6/19/2012 2:52:29 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> . ORONO PLANI�TING COMMISSION <br /> Monday,October 16,2006 <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> PLANNING COMIVIISSION COMMENTS� <br /> 9. REPORT OF PLANNING COMNIISSION REPRESENTATIVES ATTENDING <br /> COUNCIL MEETINGS SEPTEMBER 25 AND OCTOBER 9,2006 <br /> Kroeger reported on the September 25"'Council meeting,noting that a majority of the items were placed <br /> on the Consent Agenda but that there was a lengthy discussion regarding the Hempel application and the <br /> uses that should be allowed on that site. <br /> Gaffron stated the Hempel application has been withdrawn and that the City Council is going to be <br /> requesting that the site be returned back to its original zoning. Gaffron stated it is likely the site would be <br /> limited to a certain percent of retail. <br /> Kroeger stated it was commented at the City Council meeting that the majority of the retail should be <br /> located in Long Lake. � <br /> Sansevere commented he would like to see a small grocery store on that site. <br /> Kroeger stated the other item on the agenda that was discussed at length was the police contract. <br /> Sansevere indicated he was not in favor of the Orono Police Department providing free police protection <br /> to Long Lake for six months. <br /> Kempf reported on the October 9`�'Council meeting,noting that a representative from the Orono School <br /> Board was present at the meeting and gave an update on the upcoming referendum. Kempf noted the <br /> majority of the items were placed on Consent Agenda but the Dampier application was discussed at <br /> length and was finally tabled to allow the building inspector the opportunity to review the audiotape from <br /> the council meeting to see whether he recalls giving verbal approval to the applicant to exceed 15 percent <br /> structural coverage. <br /> Jurgens stated perhaps some of the comments from the building inspector to property owners should be . <br /> documented in some fashion. <br /> Gaffron stated unfortunately Staff does not have the time to document every discussion they have with an <br /> applicant. ' <br /> • 10. OTFIER ISSUES FOR DISCUSSION � <br /> None <br /> PAGE 15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.