Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF T� <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> Monday, September 18,2006 <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> (#06-3224 Thomas and Rebecca Lowe, Continued) <br /> Lowe indicated they are reducing the hardcover down to 41.8 percent,which is a reduction of almost 20� <br /> percent,and eliminating all the hardcover in the 0-75' setback zone except for the stairway access down <br /> to the lake. Lowe clarified they are not adding a deck onto the house as depicted on the plans but that <br /> there is a deck within the existing footprint of the house. <br /> Lowe stated the patio is being constructed 1.5 feet below grade to satisfy the City's requirement for a full <br /> basement and that they would prefer not to construct it at that grade. <br /> Shanatt stated they have worked extensively with Staff to design a residence that would comply as <br /> much as possible with the City's codes and that they have been successful in reducing the hardcover in <br /> the 75-250' setback zone from 60.5 percent down to 40.83 percent,with the hardcover in the 0-75 foot <br /> setback also being reduced. The foundation is also in very poor condition and would require complete <br /> replacement. The hardship that exists in this situation is the pie-shaped lot,which results in a substantial <br /> amount of land within the 0-75 foot setback zone. <br /> Sharratt requested they not be required to consiruct the residence 1.5 feet below grade to meet the City's <br /> basement requirements. <br /> Lowe distributed pictures of the residence to the Planning Commission. <br /> Sharratt stated the house is proposed to be 63.2 feet long and they are proposing to retain the existing <br /> grade as much as possible. Sharratt illustrated on the overhead the 0-75 foot setback zone and the grade <br /> elevations. Shanatt indicated they are in agreement with the concerns of the City Engineer and would <br /> prefer to leave the grade as is to allow a walkout on the residence. <br /> Bremer pointed out the applicant would then be looking for a height variance since the house would be <br /> two stories plus a walkout. <br /> Bremer opened the public hearing at 6:14 p.m. <br /> There were no public comments regarding this application. <br /> Bremer closed the public hearing at 6:14 p.m. <br /> Bremer stated she is happy that the applicants have met the City's structural coverage limit and that the <br /> Planning Commission has dealt with pie-shaped properties in the past and that the amount of hardcover <br />� being proposed may seem excessive but in reality, due to the configuration of the lot,may not be too <br /> excessive. Bremer stated she would not be in favor of the height variance due to the massing and that the <br /> applicant should bury the house 1.5 feet if the City Engineer feels the drainage issues can be resolved. <br /> Rahn noted the land area within the 0-75 foot setback zone is almost the same as the land area in the 75- <br /> 250 foot zone. Rahn commented he is unsure how the 40 percent hardcover number was arrived at and <br /> � PAGE 2 <br />