My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08/21/2006 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
08/21/2006 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/19/2012 2:50:27 PM
Creation date
6/19/2012 2:50:25 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> Monday,August 21,2006 <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> #06-3210 Steven Webster and Sandra Larson, Continued) <br /> There were no public comments regarding the application. <br /> Bremer closed the public hearing at 6:52 p.m. <br /> Rahn moved,Bremer seconded,to recommend approval of Application#06-3210, Steven and Jo <br /> Webster,500 Orono Orchard Road South,and Kent and Sandra Larson,540 Orono Orchard Road <br /> South,vacation of an alley and lot line rearrangement,subject to staff conditions outlined in the <br /> August 16,2006 Planner's report. VOTE: Ayes 5,Nays 0. <br /> 6. #06-3220 JULE AND ELIZABETH HANNAFORD, 1220 BRACKETTS POINT ROAD, <br /> VARIANCE—7:05 P.M.-7:58 P.M. <br /> Elizabeth Hannaford,Applicant,and Herb Baldwin,Landscape Architect,were present. <br /> Curtis stated the applicant is requesting 0-75-foot and 75-250-foot hardcover variances as well as a lake <br /> setback variance in order to replace the existing lakeside deck with a new,lower-profile deck and remove <br /> hardcover within the 0-75-foot zone. The existing deck encroaches almost completely into the 75-foot <br /> setback as a result of the location of the home,which has existed on the property since 1954. The <br /> applicant is proposing to remove the existing deck as well as a two-foot wide concrete path to the lake <br /> and other miscellaneous hardcover. <br /> Planning Staff recommends approval of variances in order to rebuild the lakeside deck and rear entry <br /> stoop;however,the applicant should be directed to reduce both the size of the deck and the level of <br /> hardcover on the property as a whole. <br /> Staff recommends denial of the lake setback variance to allow a greater encroachment towards the lake. <br /> Baldwin stated this project began with the issue of the deck and its need for repair. It was a pre-existing <br /> deck at the time the Hannafords purchased the property approximately 11 years ago. Both decks are in <br /> need of repair. The Hannafords are planning to remove the existing cedar decking and would be using � <br /> ironwood,which is an extremely hard and serviceable deck and will probably outlast the house. The deck <br /> is one of the things the property owners feel is important to the property. Baldwin indicated the <br /> Hannafords have a large family and use the entire deck. <br /> Baldwin illustrated on the overhead the access to the proposed deck and the deck that exists. Baldwin <br /> stated what currently happens is that the traffic is funneled onto the walkway and that they are proposing <br /> to lower the profile of the deck another six inches and utilizing wider steps to allow the people access to <br /> the grass at all points along the deck rather than focusing the traffic in one area. The amount of hardcover <br /> would be reduced from what currently exists. <br /> Baldwin explained the dry, stacked bluestone walls that currently exist are not retaining walls and are <br /> there as buffers. Baldwin indicated privacy is a problem and they are proposing a low wall with some <br /> PAGE 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.