My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07/17/2006 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
07/17/2006 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/19/2012 2:49:24 PM
Creation date
6/19/2012 2:49:20 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> Monday,July 17,2006 <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> (#05-3102 Stonewood Design Build,Continued) <br /> Gustafson stated they have recently submitted some colored drawings for review by the Planning <br /> Commission,with the items highlighted in green being the items they would like approval on. Gustafson <br /> stated they attempted to angle the garage as recommended by the Planning Commission. <br /> Gustafson noted the neighbors are in attendance at tonight's meeting and are in support of the project. <br /> Bremer opened the public hearing at 6:08 p.m. <br /> Shantelle Sumner,�930 Brown Road,indicated they are totally in favor of the new house plan and feel that <br /> � the home would help to improve the value of the homes in the neighborhood. <br /> Bremer inquired whether the applicant has reviewed the plans that have been submitted tonight. <br /> Sumner stated she has not reviewed what was submitted tonight. <br /> Gustafson stated the angled garage does not affect this neighborhood. <br /> David Skeie, 860 Brown Road, stated they were in favor of the original project and have since reviewed <br /> the new plans and are in favor of the project. <br /> Bremer closed the public hearing at 6:10 p.m. <br /> Kempf inquired whether the only difference is the angled garage on the alternate plan. <br /> Gustafson stated it is. Gustafson pointed out the difference in the massing between the two designs, <br /> noting that the latest proposal is lesser in height. <br /> Bremer inquired what plan the applicants would like to have approved. <br /> Gustafson stated the property owner has not had a chance to review the alternate plan with the angled <br /> garage. <br /> Bremer commented she personally does not have a problem with the application. <br /> Kroeger stated he does not see any benefit to the alternate plan since it is the same amount of <br /> encroachment as the original plan. <br /> Bremer stated her recollection of the concern expressed previously was the length of the structure. <br /> Gustafson stated the concern at the previous Planning Commission dealt with the long wall,which has <br /> since been modified to have a jog and a short stone wall. <br /> PAGE 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.