Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday,May 15,2006 <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> (#06-3196 PAT McNAUGHTON/ED HAMM, CONTINUED) <br /> Rahn stated he would be agreeable to including that in his motion. Rahn stated in his view the screening <br /> should be addressed at the time the lot is developed. Rahn inquired whether the Plann.ing Commission <br /> would like to establish a buffer at this time. <br /> McNaughton inquired whether the Planning Commission is in favor of a buffer. <br /> Rahn stated they are. <br /> McNaughton stated he is in favor of a buffer. <br /> Bremer stated the concern of the Planning Commission is that this application might not appear before <br /> the Planning Commission again. <br /> McNaughton inquired whether that issue could be discussed at the time he applies for a building pernut. <br /> Gaffron stated it would require some language to be included in the resolution. <br /> Rahn stated that language could be presented to the City Council. <br /> Rahn amended his motion to include a recommendation of approval for lot area variances and to <br /> require the submittal of a buffering/landscaping/berming plan that meets Planning Commission <br /> or City Council approval at the time a building permit is applied for. Bremer seconded the <br /> amended motion. <br /> Gaffron inquired whether the average lakeshore setback is included in the motion. <br /> Rahn stated it is not. <br /> VOTE: Ayes 3,Nays 2,Jurgens and Kempf opposed. <br /> Kempf indicated he would prefer to address the average lakeshore setback issue tonight and to have a <br /> review by the Planning Commission of a landscape plan. <br /> Jurgens concurred with Coxnxnissioner Kempf. <br /> PAGE 20 � <br />