Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday,May 15,2006 � <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> (#06-3196 PAT McNAUGHTON/ED HANIM,CONTINUED) <br /> Bremer noted Orono Lane is a very busy, loud road and that she would like to take this opportunity to <br /> provide for some kind of protective screening. Bremer stated it sounds like someone has been taking <br /> advantage of the previous agreement and that it is not likely she would not have supported the original <br /> agreement. <br /> Bremer commented this is a unique situation and that there is now an opportunity to do some restoration <br /> to the outlot and to screen the road. Bremer stated she would recommend the inclusion of some type of <br /> covenant or some type of statement that the applicant is agreeable to providing some landscaping. <br /> McNaughton stated he also would like to see the lake and pointed out that the highest part of the hill is <br /> located on the neighbor's property. McNaughton noted the work was completed with the proper permit <br /> from the city. McNaughton commented there also is some arborvitae between his property and the <br /> neighbors. <br /> Wells stated a drainage issue has been created in her yard because of the work done on the McNaughton <br /> property. Wells stated she now has a lake on her property. <br /> McNaughton requested the City Engineer review the property because in his view the Kokesh property <br /> is higher than his. <br /> Jurgens inquired whether this is required to be platted. <br /> Gaffron stated this is required to be a plat. � <br /> Jurgens inquired what the Planning Commission should be approving tonight. Jurgens stated he is <br /> unclear what should be approved since there is not a preliminary plat that has been submitted. <br /> Gaffron stated the applicants are proposing no changes to grade and that the Planning Commission <br /> technically does have a preliminary plat in front of them but it is called a lot line rearrangement rather <br /> than a plat. <br /> Gaffron stated it is difficult to look at the grading and drainage at this time without a plan for a proposed <br /> house being in front of them and that if the Planning Commission would like to see some improvements <br /> to the subdivision,the Planning Commission could request those. <br /> Jurgens stated in his view this should be looked at as a preliminary plat,especially given all the issues <br /> raised tonight. <br /> Jurgens moved to table Application#06-3196,Pat McNaughton/Edward Hamm, 1391 Fox <br /> Street/1401 Shoreline Drive,to allow the applicant time to submit a preliminary plat and to obtain <br /> City Engineer review. <br /> Kempf inquired whether a grading plan would be done prior to a house plan being proposed. <br /> PAGE 18 <br />