Laserfiche WebLink
. MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMNIISSION MEETING <br /> - Monday,Apri117,2006 <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> (#06-3189 Terry and Suzanne Johnson,Continued) � <br /> Mr. Johnson stated they have lived at this residence for approximately 13 years and have two children. <br /> Johnson acknowledged they did appear before the Planning Commission approximately five years ago, <br /> and at that time they proposed a single level story home,which included a garage located five feet from <br /> the lot line, and was subsequently approved by the Planning Commission. . <br /> Johnson stated the majority of the garages in their neighborhood are located within five feet of the lot line <br /> due to the small lot sizes. Johnson stated the City Council suggested that the plans be revised to go <br /> upward rather than expand the existing footprint. <br /> Johnson indicated following the City Council decision,they consulted with a structural engineer and that <br /> some foundation issues have been discovered and the central part of the house has settled. The structural <br /> engineer recommended at that time that no additional load be added to the top of the house. <br /> Johnson stated a tunnel exists on the north side of the house. Johnson inquired what they would be <br /> allowed to construct on this lot. Johnson noted they have hired an architect who has started some <br /> preliminary designs. <br /> Johnson commented there is no on street parking in his neighborhood and that they would like to have <br /> some extra space to accommodate visitors' cars. Johnson stated the turn-around allows them to avoid the <br /> need to back out on the street,which is a safety concern. <br /> Johnson stated they would like to create as much green space in the front yard as possible. Johnson noted <br /> the neighbor's garage is located less than five feet from their lot line. <br /> Rahn noted that the City did receive a letter from the neighbor at 537 Park Lane indicating their support <br /> of this project. <br /> Johnson stated they feel the proposed plan is the best alternative for this lot and that the only other option <br /> they have is to repair or replace the foundation. Johnson stated a number of their neighbors have <br /> hardcover in excess of 35 percent. <br /> Rahn opened the public hearing at 6:16 p.m. <br /> There were no public comments regarding this application. <br /> Rahn closed the public hearing at 6:16 p.m. <br /> Smith inquired whether the City in recent years has approved new home construction with variances <br /> similar to what the applicants are proposing. <br /> Curtis stated the City has not approved structural coverage variances in the past similar to what the <br /> applicant is requesting. <br /> PAGE 4 <br />