My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09/17/2007 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2007
>
09/17/2007 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/19/2012 2:33:34 PM
Creation date
6/19/2012 2:33:32 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COA�INIISSION MEETING <br /> Monday,September 17,2007 <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> (#07-3318 Anders Holm,continued) <br /> Berg opened the public hearing at 8:37 p.m. <br /> There were no public comments concerning this application. <br /> Berg closed the public hearing at 8:37 p.m. <br /> Zullo inquired what the distance is between the existing septic tank and the proposed addition. <br /> Turner stated they are at 12 and it could be 10 feet. Turner noted those locations were confirmed in the <br /> field this week. <br /> Holm stated the south property line is fairly wooded and would help to screen the addition. <br /> Otto indicated the trees along the south property line are mainly pine trees that were planted <br /> approximately 15 years ago. <br /> Zullo inquired what property the trees are on. , <br /> Otto stated there was not a survey performed at the time his parents purchased the property back in the <br /> 1950s and that there is some misunderstanding about where the exact property lines are. The nursery that <br /> was adjoining this lot at one time constructed a fence that they had assumed was along the property line. <br /> Otto stated the trees may or may not be on his property and that the shed is located partially on the other <br /> property. <br /> Holm noted the shed has been relocated to be entirely on Mr. Otto's property. <br /> Turner stated the survey was done at the time the other addition was constructed,but it does depict the <br /> accurate location of the house. . <br /> Zullo inquired whether the trees would be maintained in the years to come. • <br /> Otto stated they would be,with evergreen txees being added to the south and to the west. <br /> Zullo inquired whether the addition could be relocated back two feet. <br /> Otto stated if the addition is moved further back,it would block the view from the house of people <br /> approaching the residence. Otto indicated the addition is required to accommodate a larger family. <br /> Holm commented the angle of the house on the property also limits their options on the location of the <br /> addition. <br /> Kang stated she is having a difficult time understanding what the hardship is but that she understands the <br /> rationale of the applicant. <br /> Berg asked whether the addition should be reduced. <br /> � PAGE 17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.