Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> Monday,May 21,2007 <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> (#07-3280 Vogue ICF,Continued) <br /> become the new standard. Walsh stated it was his understanding that there had to be some hardship <br /> demonstrated and that the hardcover is not controlled by the price of the land. <br /> DeAnne Compton, 1342 Rest Point Circle, stated she also has a concern with the drainage and the fact <br /> that their cottage was not depicted on the survey. Compton indicated she did speak with the City <br /> Engineer,who stated he was not aware of the cottage. Compton requested the survey include their <br /> cottage and that the runoff from this property not be directed toward their cottage. <br /> Kroeger inquired whether the cottage is on their property or on the subject property. <br /> Compton stated the cottage is on their property and that it appears to have been hand drawn on the survey <br /> but is not to scale. Compton stated she also has a concern regarding the massing on the lot and that it had <br /> been recommended by several commissioners that the size of the structure be reduced to avoid the need <br /> for a variance. <br /> Jack Edwards, 1340 Rest Point Circle,stated at the last meeting he had the understanding that the <br /> consensus of the Planning Commission was that these two houses were too large for the properties and <br /> that they should be adjusted accordingly. Edwards stated outside of the height variance being dropped, <br /> the size of the house has not been addressed. <br /> Jan Dematteo, 1336 Rest Point Circle, stated it was implied at the beginning of this meeting that the only <br /> issue was the hardcover. Dematteo stated she understands that larger houses are going to be built in this <br /> area and that Mr.Walsh's house,which is a larger sized house,is located on two lots that were combined. <br /> David Bois, 1360 Rest Point Circle,inquired when the swales were drawn on the overhead. Bois noted <br /> the swales are not included in the packet that they received. <br /> Turner stated the plan on the overhead reflects the lowering of the house an additional foot. Turner stated <br /> the arrows on the drawing are not swales and merely indicate the direction of the drainage. Turner stated <br /> the contours of the property changed with the drop in the height of the house. <br /> Bois requested the Planning Commission look at the drainage in this area very carefully and take adequate <br /> steps to ensure that the runoff will not be directed toward the neighboring properties. <br /> Kempf noted the City does employ the services of an engineer to review and approve the drainage prior to <br /> the building permit being issued. <br /> Compton inquired whether the City Engineer has seen this latest revision. <br /> Turner stated City Staff received the revised plan this morning and that the City Engineer has not yet <br /> reviewed the plan. Turner stated in her view,given the larger swale,the City Engineer probably would <br /> not have a problem with the drainage as now depicted on the revised plan. <br /> Winer assured the neighbors that the engineer employed by the City is very competent. <br /> PAGE 3 <br />