Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> Tuesday,February 20,2007 <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> 7. #07-3259 LAKE COUNTRY BUILDERS FOR GARY AND KATHRYN GANGSTEE, <br /> 1374 REST POINT ROAD,VARIANCE,7:30 -8:13 P.M. <br /> Peter Jacobson and Ryan Smolik on behalf of Lake Country Builders were present. <br /> Gaffron stated the applicants are requesting certain variances to allow modification and expansion of <br /> the existing house and garage,including removal of the wing of the house closest to the street, a <br /> 40 square foot addition to the house,reconstruction and expansion of the second story of the house, <br /> the addition of dormers to the garage roof and construction of a two-story link between the house and <br /> garage. The variances being requested include the following: <br /> 1. Street setback for the house of 18 feet where a 12-foot setback currently exists and a 30-foot <br /> setback is required. <br /> 2. Maintain a side setback for the existing garage of 9.1 feet when a 10-foot setback is required. <br /> 3. To have 29.8 percent hardcover in the 75-250 foot zone when 25 percent is allowed and 30.3 <br /> � percent currently exists and to allow the 0-75 foot zone to remain with 9.0 percent hardcover. <br /> The applicants are proposing this as a remodel,not a rebuild. One of their goals is to be able to retain <br /> the nonconforming pool which is partially within the 0-75 foot zone and contributes to excess <br /> . hardcover on the site. � <br /> Staff recommends the Planning Commission table this application after providing the applicants with <br /> direction regarding the following issues: <br /> 1. Whether this should be considered a total rebuild; <br /> 2. VJhether there is justification based on the extent of the project to require a conforming 30- <br /> foot street setback instead of allowing a second story at the 18-foot setback; � <br /> 3. Whether the applicants should be granted a hardcover variance to be allowed to keep the pool, <br /> given that it is nonconforming and partially in the 0-75 foot zone, and that it is the primary � <br /> reason for excess hardcover on the site; . <br /> 4. Whether a hardcover variance should be granted for the 75-250 foot zone,given that this is a <br /> total rebuild on a lot�hat is nearly conforming in width and has a substantial hardcover <br /> allotment for the 75-250 foot zone; <br /> 5. VJhether there is any issue with attaching the house to the existing garage that is slightly too <br /> close to the lot line. <br /> The Planning Commission should discuss the following issues: <br /> 1. The proposal is to keep the basic house footprint location intact,but removing the wing near the <br /> PAGE 14 <br />