Laserfiche WebLink
� FILE#06-3243 <br /> November 20,2006 <br /> Page 4 of 4 <br /> effectively screeii the ten foot walls. - <br /> Staff considered a "do nothulg" alteriiative. The slope would continue to erode. The _ <br /> applicant could coiituzue to "trim" the bo� elders periociically. Event�ially parts of the slope <br /> would begiii to fail. Staff aslced the Watershecl District staff for coinments on tliis option, <br /> since they are luiowledgeable about water quality. While very careful to say they have izo <br /> aL1tIlOT1� 111 t�11S S1tLlat1011, �liey indicated the their opiiiion would be that in the long run it <br /> would be better to have some erosion into t11e lake during constr uction of the walls tlia.0 to <br /> have continued erosion and a possible landslide iiito tlie lake. <br /> Are�liere a.ny other issues or concerns with tlus a�plication? � <br /> Action Requested <br /> The Conunission hear comments from anyone who wished to speak, discuss tlie request, and <br /> . give the applicant direction oil the coiicept without making a iiiotion. � <br />