My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-20-2006 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2006
>
11-20-2006 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2012 2:46:52 PM
Creation date
6/13/2012 2:25:36 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
451
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
D'IIl�TUTES OF T� ° <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMII�SSSION <br /> - 1!'Sonday,August 21,2006 <br /> . 6:00 o'clocic p.nn. � <br /> (#06-3225 875 WB'S?4',LY,C, Continued) � <br /> since it would add more hardcover on the'site. Joluislon noted some bump-out areas could�erha�s be <br /> incoxporated if necessaiy. � <br /> 7oluzston indicated a retaining wall w1s considered in place of the 1:1 slope near the Luce Line because <br /> they liad concerns with the closeness fio fihe horse i�•ail Uut it was detern7ined thai;the 1:1 slope would Ue <br /> more aesthetically pleasing and safer. � <br /> Breiner opened the public l�earing at 5:47 p.m. ' <br /> There�vere no public connnents regarding this a�plication. <br /> . . , . <br /> Bremer closed ihe public hearing at 8:47�.in. • <br /> Bremer commented she likes the revisioils that have tieeil niade to the plan and that the only issue in her <br /> nlind is the RPUD standards. Bremer stated as it relates to tlle nzinunum lot size, she would be supportive <br /> of allowing a few lots to be less than tlie required 15,00 square feet. <br /> Jurge�is questioned wl�ether the outlot to the wetlands would adversely impact the lot lincs but that he <br /> ' would prefer the wetlands be included in the outlot since joint ownershi�of the wetlands lielps to deter <br /> people from using that ar�a. ' � <br /> Bremer inquired whether the smaller lot size���ould inlpact the marketaUility oi'this c�evel_ogment. . <br /> Carlsoii stated the sinaller lot sizes are harder to ivarket and that he prefers larger lots. <br /> Kexnpf indicated he also is not opposed to the proposed lot sizes and that he would like to see the <br /> wetlands included in the outlot. <br /> I�oeger stated he is in favor of the zero lot liiie. <br /> •Bremer stated she Ilas a concern with how the side of the Lmifis��vould Ue nlainiained tivitli the zero lot line. <br /> Gaffron inquired whether windows��ould be allowed on tliat side of ihe house if there is a zero lot liiie. <br /> Ralui stated typically there are zero openings withiil iluee feet of a lot line and that windows on that side <br /> would Ue difficul�. <br /> Carlson stated ihe windows are desi�ied to be transient windows and would be located up higher. <br /> • Ral�i�stated the��valls���ould need to be rated with a zero loi:line. <br /> Carlson stated the concept is as you loolc out the front,there would be lai7dscal�ing and ofher amenities <br /> and the ov�mer Uasically�vould not see that side of the house. <br /> PAGE 19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.