Laserfiche WebLink
mmvuT�cs or Ta� � <br /> • ORONO PLANiVING COMNIISSTON <br /> DZonday,August 21,2006 � <br /> 6:00 o'clocic p.m. - <br /> (#06-3225 875\�V73�'V,LLC, Continued) � <br /> 2. The maximum numUer of dwelling units on the properly sllall Ue nine. � <br /> 3. The dwelling uiiiis shall be single-family detached dwellings with a low profile,limited to one- <br /> story plus Uasement, and of an architectural style that Ulends with the nafiaral suiZOUndings. <br /> Gaffi•on noied that Council did not wish to place a limit on roof slope or other design paraineters in the <br /> Comprellensive Plan,but iizdicaied that dorniers within roof systems would Ue okay,Uut 1-1/2 story <br /> desigus would not be accepted. . . <br /> 4. The development shall be served witli munici�al sewer and tivater. It will Ue tlze develo�er's <br /> responsibility to procure sewer and water service for development of the property. <br /> 5. The development shall adhere to all regulations of the C"ity wiih respect to wetland protection, <br /> 6. The development shall adhere to the pruzcipals of Conseivation Design as establislled througl�the • <br /> � Orono Rural Oasis visioning process completed in 2005 and scheduled to be codified in 2006- <br /> 2007. <br /> 7. Site developnzent shall be designed and constructed in such a manner t11at projects a rural <br /> character as viewed fiom Old Higliway 12 a rnotorists enter the cities of Orono and Long Lake <br /> froin the east. � <br /> 8. Site develo�ment shall Ue desi�ied and coiisiructed iii such a�namier that inininuzes the visual <br /> iinpact of density as viewed from tlie Luce Line Trail. <br /> 9. Site vehicular access shall be via a single coruiectioii to (Old)Highway 12. . <br /> Staff does not feel that these requuements are particularly probleniatic;however,the a�plicani shall�ay <br /> particular attentioil to Itein 4, as this��t�ill require coordination v�rifih Long Lalce, and Itenz 6,wl�ich will <br /> require that applicant engage the appropriate consultanis to prepare a Conservation Design Master Plan <br /> for the development. � � <br /> Tlie Planning Commission should review the RPUD development standards for single-fainily cletached <br /> dwellings at n�edium deiisity and should consider whet•her filiere are any specific slandards that need <br /> special consideration for the proposed development. <br /> Additional items for eonsideratioil by the Planniilg Conimission include the followin�: <br /> 1. The potenCial impacts of this develo�rnent on Luce Line Trail users; abiliiy to mitigate those <br /> impacts. <br /> � 2. Consider the�ros and coiis of individually owned�vetlaild segments versus a dedicated wetlaizd � <br /> outlot o�med and managed by the homeowners associatioii. <br /> PAGE 17 <br />