Laserfiche WebLink
06-3229 � <br /> September 12,2006 � � <br /> . Page 4 of 4 <br /> Issues for Consideration . � <br /> 1. The Plaruling Commission should discuss the nlemo from the Septic Inspector <br /> (Exhibit G). Since it appears that ihe septic site is a limiting factor, should the house <br /> � design be revised to match the septic system� capability? Also, would it be <br /> appropriate to have a covenant recorded against the property restricfiing development <br /> fio a 3-bedroom "type II" structure? <br /> 2. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? <br /> Staff Recommendation <br /> Planning staff recommends approval of the renewal of the lot area variance subject � <br /> revising the design to match the capabilities of the septic system, and documenting these <br /> conditions via covenants. � . <br /> , <br />