Laserfiche WebLink
FILE#06-3224 <br /> 12 September 2006 <br /> Page 4 of 4 ' <br /> StafF Iinds ihat regarding lot are� there is historical justification to grant a variance, <br /> however the overage in structural coverage resulting excess hardcover cannot be <br /> supported by staff. The structural foofiprint of the proposed home should be reduced to at <br /> . least 15%, and subsequently the hardcover will be reduced. The stair on the proposed . <br /> deck coulci be reoriented or changed to meet the average lakeshore setback, as well as <br /> reduce tlie siructur�l and hardcover levels. Additionally, as stated above there are <br /> etements of this proposal which could be revisecl or eliminated to reduce the proposed 75' <br /> —250' hardcover. <br /> Tssues for Consider�►tion <br /> 1. The siair for tlie lalceside deck encroaches into the average lakeshore setback. Are <br /> views of the lake from adjacent properties impacted by the stair encroaclunent? <br /> Should the stair or deck be revised so that it meets the average lalceshore setback? <br /> Or is there jltstification for an average setback variance? � <br /> 2. Are there any other issues or eoncerns with this application? <br /> St�ff Recommend�tion <br /> Plamling Department Staff reconunends approval of the lot area variance and approv�l of <br /> some level of hardcover variance as the Planning Commission deems appropriate, subject <br /> to submittal of a with a grading and drainage plan which meets the City Engineer's <br /> approval. Staff also recomnzends the plans be revised as necessary to result in a home <br /> meeting the City's height requirements. Finally, staff recommends denial of the 0.2% <br /> overage in structural coverage. <br /> � The plans should be revised to address the City Engineer's recominendations. <br /> 4 <br />