Laserfiche WebLink
FILE#06-3237 <br /> - Octobec 16,2006 <br /> Page 3 of 3 <br /> provisioits of f/te Zo�ti�tg Code i�t iirstrutces wlrere //reir stricl enforcente�it wou/d catrse turrlue hrrrrlsliip <br /> becrurse of circrunstances uniqrre to 1he inrlividual prn��erty rinder co�rsideralian, �u�d s/ta!! reconunend <br /> npprova/oirly w/1en it is rlemo�rslrnted that srrclr rrctio�rs �vill be i�r keeping rvit/r llre s��irit«nd inte�lt of tlre <br /> Oroi�o Zo�ri�tg Code. <br /> By longstaiiding City policy hardcover trade-offs and rearrailgemeiits resulting u1 a net <br /> hardcover reduction but not iu conforinity caiuiot be approved adnluiistratively. The change <br /> is St�te Statute that allows replacemeilt of a non-conforiniiig st�•ucture has created a paradox <br /> that can Ue seen liere: The applicant is required to obtain a variance to bruig the property <br /> closer to compliance with the hardcover regulations while they would be able to exactly <br /> replace the existiiig patio and deck without a variance. <br /> Issues for•Consideration � . <br /> Are there any other issues or coiiceriis with tlus application? <br /> Staff Recommend�tion <br /> Plaiuung Staff reconunends approval of the hardcover variance. <br />