Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> . FILE 06-3236 <br /> ' October 16,200 � <br /> • Page 2 of 3 � <br /> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- <br /> LOT ANALYSIS WORSHEET . <br /> Lot Area/Width: <br /> Re uired Actual <br /> Lot Area 2 acres � .83 acres <br /> Lot Width 200 feet 105 feet <br /> Setbacks: � <br /> Re uired � Existin Pro osed <br /> Street 50 feet 30 feet No chan e <br /> Rear 50 feet 290 feet No chan e <br /> Nortli Side 30 feet. 17.4 feet 10 feet <br /> South Side 30 feet 38.2 feet No cliange <br /> ' Structural Covera�e: <br /> Allowed Existin Pro osed <br /> 5,816 s.f. (15%) 1,650 s.f. (4.25%) 1,864 s.f. (4.8%) <br /> Setback Variances � <br /> The north side setback of the applicant's house is non-conforn�g. The house sits at a.ii <br /> � angle to tliis property line. The front corner of the house is about 25 feet froin the property <br /> � line and the rear cornei: 17.4 feet. (The required setback is 30 feet.) Tlle applicant wishes to <br /> construct a deck across the rear of his holise, extending out 12 feet. The house is about 40 <br /> feet long. He has been issued a pernut and coiistructed the soutlZerly 21 feet of the deck, tlie <br /> portion that coniplies with the side yaxd setback. The variaizce would allow lum to build an <br /> additional 17.8 feet of deck. The froiit coriier of the additional deck wot�ld be 17.4 feet from <br /> • the noi�tlZ property line, the rear corner 10 feet fronl the north property line. In conjunctioil <br /> with the deck expansion the Applicant plans to iiistall a patio door in the adjacent rear wall of <br /> the house. This would provide access to the deck from the house without gouig through the <br /> kitchen aiid porch. _ • ' <br /> Hardship Statement <br /> Applicant has conlpleted the Hardslup Documentation Form attached as ExhiUit B, and <br /> should be asked for additional testiiiioizy regarding the application. <br /> Hardship Analysis <br /> I�r corrsirlering«pplicatio�is for i�ruia�rce, t/te P/nniring Conrmissioir s/ia!!corrsirler the effect of 1he proposed <br /> >>aria�ice upon iJ1e/tealllr, safety «nd welfnre of t/te conrinruiity, e�;isting nrrd r�rrticipnterl irrcffrc conditions, <br /> ligllt aird«ir, dauger of frre, risk to!he public safefy, a�rJ i/re effect oir valrres vf property iir tlre surroiurrli�rg <br /> «re�r. The Planning Comnrissiar sJrnll consirler reco�nnrerr�ling «pprvva/ for nnriairces fro�u t/re liJerrrl <br /> provisions of�/re Zoiri�rg Code i�r instairces wlrere tlreir slrict enforcenreilt ►vorr/d canse turrlrre Irards/rip <br /> becnrrse of circrr�rrstrr�rces rrnir/rre io the irrrlivirh�al propertJ� rrnder consideration, a�rd s/ral! recomnrend . <br /> approva/oirly when it is tle»ronstrntet!t/ta!such aclio�ts tvi//be i�r keeping wiih tlte spirit tt�td iittertt of t/te <br /> Orono Zo�ri�rg Code. . " <br />