Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF TAE , <br /> ORONO PLANNlNG COMNIISSTON - <br /> , Monday,Septetnber 18,2006 <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> (#06-3228 Rick and Kristine Sterling, Continued) <br /> There were no puUlic conuiients relating to this application. � • � <br /> Brenier closed the public hearing at 7:24 p.m. <br /> , Jurgens inquired whether there is a variance for the boathouse. <br /> Tui7ier stated the boathouse is a legal nonconforniing shucture. <br /> Ratu1 noied this is not a rebuild. <br /> Turner stated tlie City Attorney has advised Staff that a person caiuiot Ue required to remove a structure as <br /> a condition for something else. <br /> Sterling stated he is not in favor of renloving the boathouse. <br /> Bremer conimented the Planning Commission looks at all aspects of a lot to see where hardcover can be <br /> reduced and that they are not requiring removal of the boathouse at this time. - <br /> � Rahn moved,Kempf seconded,to recommend approval of Application#06-3228,Rick and Kristine <br /> Sterling,1300.Vine Place,granting of an average lakeshore setback variance,subject to the <br /> hardcover being reduced to 25 percent hardcover,tivith the understanding that if tlie 25 percent <br /> hardcover is not met,the application would come back before the Planning Commission for further <br /> revie�v. VOTE: Ayes 5,Nays 0. . <br /> Kempf inquired whether the applicant would require a conditional use perniit in connection with the <br /> removal of the stairway. <br /> Sterling stated to his understanding they would not need to change the grade. <br /> Bremer reconunended the applicant notify Staff of his�lans regarding the stairway. <br /> 4. #OG-3229 TIMOTHY V.AND CHERRIE PETERSON,560 BIG ISLAND,VARIANCE <br /> 7:30—7:42 P.M. <br /> Timothy Peterson,Applicant,was present. <br /> Curtis stated the applicant is requesting renewal of a lot area variance to pernlit development of a lot 3.33 <br /> acres in size,of which 1.1 acres is dry aizd where 5.0 acres of dty Uuildable is normally required in order <br /> to construct a seasonal caUin on an existing vacant lot. The previous property ov�mer had received a lot <br /> area variance for this�roperty in NovemUer 2004. The property has remained vacant since prior to <br /> adoption of the current Seasonal Recreation District standards. � <br /> ' PAGE 10 <br />