My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-16-2006 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2006
>
10-16-2006 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2012 3:30:23 PM
Creation date
6/13/2012 11:38:09 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1749
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
#06-3240 B�sement&Story DeCnitions <br /> October 12,2006 . . <br /> P�ge 4 � <br /> b) the `neat floor' is more tllan 6 feet above the finished ground level for at least <br /> 50% of the total buildiii�perinieter [so we ineasure the exposed wall below tlze <br /> `neat floor' for the whole builcling (? or for just that part with a lower level?) <br /> and if the exposed wall is more than 6' for more thaii 50% of the perimeter, the <br /> � basement is really a story]; or . <br /> c) tlie `next floor' is more than 12 feet above finislied grade at any point. <br /> Finished Grade vs Pre-Existing Grade � <br /> Uiitil perliaps a year ago, we allowed the 6' basemeiit wall coverage required Uy our fiulctional <br /> definition,to be met by ai-tificially filling against tlie foundation. The result was that on certain <br /> Iots, builders n�ight liave just oiie corner of a house meetiilg tlle 6' foundation coverage . <br /> naf�irally, then piliiig dii�t up against other foundation walls to get to a 50%perimeter coverage <br /> . of 6'. Piling fill against the founclation and leaving it at a steep slope resulted in an i.uuiat�iral <br /> artificially fu�islied a�pearance, and in the case where retaining walls were added 5-10' out <br /> from the foundation to retaiii the fill,the baseinent fioin a distance looked like a story. <br /> We then revised our functional defiiutioil to require that tlie 6' coverage must be based on pre- <br /> existing grades, not artificially raised grades, based on the existing definition of building height <br />` "' that disallows "topograpluc changes wluch elevate the adjoining ground level above the � <br /> existing terrain". Since tlus cliange, probably half of tlie building plans that have come before <br /> us lZave had to be revised to ineet tlus standard, because most holnes beiiig btiilt today have <br /> tUree full levels - if the baseiilent is a story, then they have a 3-story home not iileeting the 2- <br /> 1/2 story limit. <br /> Average Elevation vs Grade Plane , <br /> . Both the zoning code and 2000 TBC definitioils relate to an `average grade' concept, related to <br /> fiiushed grade, but measure it differeiitly: <br /> . - the zoning code nleasures it as the avera�e elevation of the finished ground surface <br /> . witlun 5 feet of the foundation; <br /> - the IBC measures fihe "grade plaile" as the average of fmished �ground level adjoiiung <br /> . � the exterior walls. Where the grade slopes away froin the building, the reference points <br /> to be used in determining tlie average fiiushed ground level are tlze lowest points of the <br /> finished ground surface within 6 feet of ihe buildiiig. <br /> We have concluded that "average elevation" caiuiot be simply the average of the liighest aiid <br /> lowest elevatioiis that the foundation abuis; it llas to be a weighted average based oii�lie entire <br /> perinleter. This, coupled with haviiig to deterniiiie final (or pre-existing) grades at some <br /> distlnce of 5-6' out froin tlie foundation, adds com�lexity to the deteriniiiatioil of whether a <br /> level is a baseinent or a story. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.