My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-17-2006 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
07-17-2006 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2012 11:26:04 AM
Creation date
6/13/2012 11:25:10 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
679
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
, � , � C, <br /> Page 1 of 4 <br /> HARDSHIP DOCUMENTATION FORM. <br /> This form is a required submittal for ALL variance applications. An application <br /> will not be considered complete or placed on any meeting agendas until this form is <br /> complete and submitted to the City. <br /> Minnesota State Statutes Section 394.27, Subdivision 7 requires that a hardship be <br /> demonstrated in order for a variance to be granted. The hardship must be unique to the <br /> property as variances run with the land and not the land owner. Personal and economic <br /> situations are not considered valid hardships._In order for an application to be heard by <br /> the Planning Commission and City Council a hardship having merit must be demonstrated. <br /> HOW DO I PROVE A HARDSHIP? <br /> This form has 12 points outlining the basis City staff uses to determine if a hardship <br /> exists and how the variance will affect the surrounding community. To prove a hardship, <br /> address all the relevant points listed below and answer them as clearly as possible. <br /> Since you are requesting the code exception, you have the burden of proving that the <br /> variance is justified. The information the city receives is what is used in determining a <br /> denial or approval recommendation. If you leave something out it will not be considered. <br /> Please address each of these hardship criteria as they relate to the request (some may <br /> not apply): <br /> 1. "The� property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under <br /> conditions allowed by the official controls." <br /> The answer to Question 2 provides a more detailed response and background <br /> conceming "reasonable use" of the property and for brevity will not be repeated in <br /> response to Question 1. <br /> The subject property is planned and zoned for industrial and office-showroom land <br /> uses. The nature and character of this type of land development is large massing <br /> of building types and associated parking fields that cannot be divided into smaller <br /> parts and still remain competitive in the marketplace or meet the needs and <br /> expectations of prospective tenants. The granting of a variance for the 50-foot <br /> public right-of-way (Outlot A) is critical to accommodate access to the properly and <br /> so the applicant may be able to design and construct a building type that is <br /> consistent with the zoning and land use categories and meet the needs and <br /> expectations of the marketplace. <br /> The necessary location of Outlot A with 70-feet of right-of-way (see Question 2)will <br /> divide the site in such a way that the massing of industrial and office-showroom <br /> buildings and their associated parking will be hindered in the southern part of the <br /> site. The developer will not be able to achieve the land use density for this property <br /> anticipated by the City's zoning and land use codes. "Reasonabfe use" of the <br /> property, consistent with the City's Zoning Code will as a result be denied without <br /> the requested 50-foot Outlot A right-of-way. <br /> Crystal Bay Business Park June 19, 2006 <br /> Hardship Documentation Form/Variance Request <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.