My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-17-2006 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2006
>
07-17-2006 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2012 11:26:04 AM
Creation date
6/13/2012 11:25:10 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
679
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
� , . _ , <br /> ,�- „ , . , ' <br /> ' #06-3180 2285 French Creek Circle ' � � <br /> July 13,2006 . : . <br /> Page 5 - . : <br /> City Engineer's Comments • ' � <br /> _ <br /> The City Engineer in his March 13 letter made the following comments: <br /> 1) The plans should be revised to show the contours extending past the properiy lines to <br /> define drainageways (a revised survey has since been pYOVidec� <br /> 2) The plans should include retaining wall details (retaining wall details have now been <br /> providec� <br /> 3) The plans should include some type of permanent erosion control measures at the <br /> discharge point for the PVC pipes shown off the northwest corner of the house. <br /> (the revised plans include erosion control measures) <br /> The new submitta.ls have been provided to the ciiy engineer and his comments are forthcoming. <br /> Issues for Consideration <br /> 1. Planning Commission should consider whether the additional encroachment of structure . <br /> _ , into the required 150' setback can be supported by findings of hardship or unique . <br /> circuxnstances related to tYus lot. ' � <br /> 2. Plaruung Commission should deternline whether granting of an average setback ' <br /> variance will have any negative impacts on lake views enjoyed by neighboring property <br /> owners. <br /> 3. Planning Corrunission should look closely at the layout and access to the additions in . <br /> terms of its potential to be used as a guest apartment, which use requires a Conditional <br /> Use Permit under City ordinances. The applicant has no stated intent to use the additions <br /> as a guest apartment, hence a precautionary note in the approval resolution may be <br /> sufficient to warn future owners of the CUP requirement. - <br /> 4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? <br /> Staff Recommendation <br /> Staff recommends approval of the lakeshore setback and average lakeshore setback variances, <br /> subject to meeting the requirements of the City Engineer and Septic Systems Inspector. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.