My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-17-2006 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
07-17-2006 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2012 11:26:04 AM
Creation date
6/13/2012 11:25:10 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
679
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
� MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANIVZNG COMNIISSION MEETING ; ,�= � ��••��•� <br /> Monday,June 19, 2006 �'�����`�''L k;�� ` <br /> 6:00 o'ciock p.m. <br /> Planning Commission is merely a recommending body and that the City Council may not approve of the <br /> building m.aterial being proposed. <br /> Gaffron stated Staff treated this as a slcetch plan review,which allows the Planning Commission and <br /> Cify Council to get a preliminary look at the plans. Gaffron stated the Planning Commission�vould see <br /> this application again as a preliminary plat. <br /> Bremer stated in her vie�v this proposal fits in with the character of Orono and also �ts in with the <br /> zoning for this area. Bremer stated her biggest concein relates to �i affic. <br /> Gaffron requested the Planning Commission consider the back building and the 50-foot corridor versus <br /> the7J�5 foot corridor. Gaffron questioned�vhether the design of the L-shaped building is driving the <br /> need for a variance. <br /> Mc7oltin stated the�vidth of the building is 120 feet,which is about as narrow as you should get for this <br /> 7o r� h�-�c�r�Y � <br /> type of building. McJoltin stated the 7/5-foot s��would limit the amount of space available for the <br /> turning radius and that the smaller turning radius would cause problems for the larger trucks. <br /> '70 <br /> Rahn inquired whether?�3 feet is the right-of-way. <br /> roradWa�Y <br /> Turner stated you rvould have 10 feet of grass on either side of the�. <br /> � <br /> Bremer commented screening would be a number one priority for her on that building. <br /> Jurgens inquired what the city's standard is for a road right-of-way. � � <br /> Gaffron stated it is 70 feet and that the applicant is requesting a variance, <br /> Jurgens inquired why it is being shown as an outlot. <br /> Swanke stated the intent is to dedicate it at the time of final plat. <br /> J�irgens stated the road right-of-way should be 70 feet. <br /> Rahn stated he is in agreement with the 70 feet and that the applicants may need to find a different use <br /> for the building. <br /> PEAG� 22 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.