Laserfiche WebLink
. - ORONO PLANNING COMIYIXSS�ON 1lxL�TING '�!,�a�'� <br /> • Moud1y,11�I1y 1G, 2005 ��,,._:,.,,� <br /> � 6:00 o'ciocic p.zn. . <br /> .� <br /> 2. #05-3102 KAT�.2.'YN AL�X:AI�IDEx2.ON l3�TS�lT��' OF J'. SV�N GUSTArSON', 920 <br /> BROWN ROAD SOTJT�T,VARIAI�FC�S, G:5G P.IYI.—7:23 P.lY1. <br /> J. Svei1 GustlCsou, A��liclnl:, w�s preseni:. Ricic aud Tailet Iaraticis,pro�erly owners, were preseilt. . <br /> Gaffroii izoted a lei;Cer 4vas received Ieon1 I�atluyi�Alexander sLipporLing her positioil regarding the request <br /> for variauces, <br /> Gaffi•oYZ stai:ed�L Che last Plai�iiiig Coulnzission meeting the applicauts had proposed side setblck <br /> �ariances on Uotli sides i;o allow a new ltome to be located 15.5 feet from tlie iiorth side lot line and 1S. <br /> Feet from the sotrth side loC line. The a�plicauts have since revised tlleir plans and are now�roposiug a <br /> north side setback of 18 feet where 30 feet would nornially be required in additioiz to lot area 1i�d lot <br /> widtti variauces. The applicants have elinlinated the reqtiiest for a soufih side setback variance, <br /> Staff recoirunends approval of ttle lot�vidth and lot area variances. Staff is recommending that the <br /> Platuting Conullissioi�. discuss the revised plans atZd detemZine wliether there is hardship or justificltion <br /> for the side lot setback vai•iance. � � <br /> Gaffioii noted at the last nieeting a discussion was had regarding the loug nanow lot and how the saine , <br /> size foolprint,without tlie side yard setUacic,would niake tlle house longer aild have a gi-eater view impaci: <br /> on the neighbors. Gaffron stated the a�plicailts are rvilluig to reiilove two hees to relocate tlie driveway <br /> to meet the five-foot setback fioin the south lot line. <br /> Gaffi'on noted tllere are no hardcover or sf�-uctural issues on tlus property. ' <br /> Gustafsoii stated they have taken the Planning Conmlission's coiiuiients into consideratioli and have <br /> revised their proposal to luiut a variauce on only one side of the property. Gustafson indicated lze would <br /> prefer to split ihe d.istance bett�veen both sides of tlie property Iine. Gustafson stated the trees that tliey are <br /> proposing to reiizove are cottonwoods and that the neigliUors are not opposed to the removal, <br /> Gustafson distributed tlu•ee different fooipriiits of tlie type of home the pro�erty owners tivo�ild prefer to <br /> be built on this lot. Gustafson indicated the neighbors are not particularly in favor of ihe house designs <br /> giveii the lengih of the ho�tse. Gustafson stated in ltis opinio7l the neighbors t�vottld preler the difference <br /> be sglit aud tlle house iiiade�vider,tivhich is also tlze�roperty otivner's preference. <br /> Ralui sialed it appears thal tl�e survey conflicts tiviL•h tlie ori�iital iloor p1aYi and quesi•ioned whether the <br /> decic and�oreli wo�tld eneroaeh into ihe side yard seL•back. Ral�n si•ated lie would not Ue in favor of <br /> �l�l�loving a deek or a�orch ii'ii eneroaclies into tlle side yat•d sel•bacic. Ralni slaLcd ExhiUits D1 �nd B2 <br /> show the deek located ouiside of lhe dining room and the screen porcli eiicroaching. <br /> Gustafsoii a�•ecd they do appeaT L'0 U�111COI1515L'e11I:. <br /> R�lin st�l•ed he ciocs�ZOt h�ve a mljor issue with tl�e garage encroaehinb Uut would iioi be ii� su�l�orl•of l•he <br /> decic or poreh encroael�ing into the side yacd selUacic. Ralui noLed lhe izeigltboc to (he norl•h had aslced Cliat <br /> tl�►e houi� noL•enct•o�eh auy eloser than 24 fce['. • <br /> ' <br /> :L'E1.G�7 <br />